RE: [soa-blueprints] links to implementations

["Miko Matsumura" <mmatsumura@infravio.com>]

Yes, my plan was to have it not be a working session so much as an opportunity to put names to faces and to socialize and make plans... Should be a couple hours at most...
 
Best,
Miko

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Michael Stiefel [mailto:development@reliablesoftware.com] 
	Sent: Wed 9/28/2005 11:25 AM 
	To: Miko Matsumura 
	Cc: soa-blueprints@lists.oasis-open.org 
	Subject: RE: [soa-blueprints] links to implementations
	
	

	Would this be just a one day F2F?
	
	Michael
	
	At 10:24 AM 9/27/2005, Miko Matsumura wrote:
	>Yes, I am proposing Monday Oct 3rd. I think the first and third Mondays
	>would work for meetings.
	>
	>I'm interested in having a F2F for this TC at Infoworld SOA Executive
	>Forum in NYC on Nov 7, would others be interested in this venue?
	>
	>Thanks,
	>Miko
	>
	>         -----Original Message-----
	>         From: Michael Stiefel [mailto:development@reliablesoftware.com]
	>         Sent: Tue 9/27/2005 7:15 AM
	>         To: Mark Little; Miko Matsumura
	>         Cc: soa-blueprints@lists.oasis-open.org
	>         Subject: Re: [soa-blueprints] links to implementations
	>
	>
	>
	>         I assume then we will not have a call on Thursday.
	>
	>         Are you proposing Monday as the standard call day? I assume it is
	> better
	>         for everyone to know as far as possible in advance what the call
	> day will be.
	>
	>         Michael
	>
	>         At 10:02 AM 9/27/2005, Mark Little wrote:
	>         >That's fine with me, but under OASIS rules, unless the later call is
	>         >formal, it wouldn't be sufficient to maintain voting rights.
	> Obviously if
	>         >it were formal and anyone who attended the prior meeting didn't
	> attend the
	>         >AsiaPac meeting, they'd then run the risk of losing voting
	> rights if they
	>         >missed the next formal meeting.
	>         >
	>         >Mark.
	>         >
	>         >
	>         >Miko Matsumura wrote:
	>         >
	>         >>Hi Everyone,
	>         >>
	>         >>Results from the informal poll are in:
	>         >>
	>         >>Quick Summary of Voting Results: - 8AM PST (GMT-008) received
	> 13 Votes
	>         >>- 9AM PST received 18 Votes
	>         >>- 1PM PST received 7 Votes
	>         >>- 4PM PST received 3 Votes
	>         >>- 7PM PST received 0 Votes
	>         >>- 10PM PST received 3 Votes
	>         >>
	>         >>I think it's best that we go with 9AM Pacific Time, and we hold
	> perhaps
	>         >>a later informational call for AsiaPac...
	>         >>
	>         >>How would Monday October 3 be for a next call date?
	>         >>
	>         >>Best,
	>         >>Miko
	>         >>
	>         >>
	>         >
	>         >--
	>         >Mark Little
	>         >Chief Architect
	>         >Arjuna Technologies Ltd
	>         >www.arjuna.com
	>         >
	>
	>
	>