[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [soa-blueprints] possible ftf [was: links to implementations]
Vancouver is easier to get to than Tahoe for Bay area residents. It is a simple 1:50 flight from SFO to YVR, vs. several hours to drive to Tahoe. I do this several times a month. Flights are about $200. I suggest we set up a vote now since it takes a good 3 month to arrange a meeting including all necessary social events surrounding the meeting. Here is a photo of the front steps of our house party for SOA RM TC: http://www.nickull.net/SOA-RM-TC-PHOTOS/DSC00404.JPG Duane -----Original Message----- From: Miko Matsumura [mailto:mmatsumura@infravio.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 3:55 PM To: Duane Nickull; Cunningham David; soa-blueprints@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [soa-blueprints] possible ftf [was: links to implementations] The other one would be Tahoe, which is driveable from the San Francisco Bay Area... Depending on the numbers, we could have an informal meet and greet at the November 7 event in NYC... Best, Miko -----Original Message----- From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com] Sent: Wed 9/28/2005 3:38 PM To: Cunningham David; soa-blueprints@lists.oasis-open.org Cc: Subject: RE: [soa-blueprints] possible ftf [was: links to implementations] Vancouver is only 1.5 hours from Whistler and we also offer nightly skiing/boarding until 10:30 PM locally (about 35 minutes from downtown by car). I recently set up a meeting for the SOA RM TC which was deemed to be a success. If this TC is interested in coming to Vancouver for some sushi, skiing, pizza, beer and work, please let me know. I can make inquiries now. The Opus Hotel is the venue I would chose. Duane -----Original Message----- From: Cunningham David [mailto:cunningham_david@bah.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 2:05 PM To: soa-blueprints@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [soa-blueprints] possible ftf [was: links to implementations] +1 for January near snow! -----Original Message----- From: Jones, Steve G [mailto:steve.g.jones@capgemini.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 4:52 PM To: Ken Laskey; Miko Matsumura Cc: soa-blueprints@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [soa-blueprints] possible ftf [was: links to implementations] Backing this up its also business review period for many of us and Q4 crunch... Can I suggest we plan for a January Event (anywhere near mountains with snow ensures my attendance!) as its normally a quiet period. Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: Ken Laskey [mailto:klaskey@mitre.org] > Sent: 28 September 2005 19:39 > To: Miko Matsumura > Cc: <soa-blueprints@lists.oasis-open.org> > Subject: Re: [soa-blueprints] possible ftf [was: links to > implementations] > > We're getting into the busy conference and holiday season, and I don't > know how likely it is to find a time slot on what is now short notice > for the rest of the year. > > We just went through this with SOA-RM and the picture isn't a pretty > one. > > Ken > > On Sep 27, 2005, at 10:24 AM, Miko Matsumura wrote: > > > Yes, I am proposing Monday Oct 3rd. I think the first and third > > Mondays would work for meetings. > > > > I'm interested in having a F2F for this TC at Infoworld SOA > > Executive Forum in NYC on Nov 7, would others be interested in this venue? > > > > Thanks, > > Miko > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michael Stiefel [mailto:development@reliablesoftware.com] > > Sent: Tue 9/27/2005 7:15 AM > > To: Mark Little; Miko Matsumura > > Cc: soa-blueprints@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject: Re: [soa-blueprints] links to implementations > > > > > > > > I assume then we will not have a call on Thursday. > > > > Are you proposing Monday as the standard call day? I assume it is > > better > > for everyone to know as far as possible in advance what the call > > day will be. > > > > Michael > > > > At 10:02 AM 9/27/2005, Mark Little wrote: > > >That's fine with me, but under OASIS rules, unless the later call > is > > >formal, it wouldn't be sufficient to maintain voting rights. > > Obviously if > > >it were formal and anyone who attended the prior meeting didn't > > attend the > > >AsiaPac meeting, they'd then run the risk of losing voting rights > if > > they > > >missed the next formal meeting. > > > > > >Mark. > > > > > > > > >Miko Matsumura wrote: > > > > > >>Hi Everyone, > > >> > > >>Results from the informal poll are in: > > >> > > >>Quick Summary of Voting Results: - 8AM PST (GMT-008) received 13 > > Votes > > >>- 9AM PST received 18 Votes > > >>- 1PM PST received 7 Votes > > >>- 4PM PST received 3 Votes > > >>- 7PM PST received 0 Votes > > >>- 10PM PST received 3 Votes > > >> > > >>I think it's best that we go with 9AM Pacific Time, and we hold > > perhaps > > >>a later informational call for AsiaPac... > > >> > > >>How would Monday October 3 be for a next call date? > > >> > > >>Best, > > >>Miko > > >> > > >> > > > > > >-- > > >Mark Little > > >Chief Architect > > >Arjuna Technologies Ltd > > >www.arjuna.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > ------------------ > Ken Laskey > MITRE Corporation, M/S H305 phone: 703-983-7934 > 7515 Colshire Drive fax: 703-983-1379 > McLean VA 22102-7508 This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]