RE: [soa-blueprints] links to implementations

["Miko Matsumura" <mmatsumura@infravio.com>]

Hi everyone,

Dial in for Monday will be the same as last time--

1-877-229-4100 (toll free)
or
719-867-0073 (international bridge)

Passcode
605968

Thanks,
Miko

-----Original Message-----
From:	Jeffrey.Lamb@wellsfargo.com [mailto:Jeffrey.Lamb@wellsfargo.com]
Sent:	Fri 9/30/2005 7:44 AM
To:	Miko Matsumura
Cc:	soa-blueprints@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject:	RE: [soa-blueprints] links to implementations
Is there a conference line number and participant code for the Monday
October 3 meeting?
Assuming, as stated below, it will be at 9am Pacific coast (US) time 


_______________________
Jeff Lamb, CCP
Wells Fargo Services, Enterprise Architecture
415.371.3106 Direct line (New, as of June 3 2005)
Jeffrey.Lamb@WellsFargo.com

> This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on
this message or any information herein.  If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation.

-----Original Message-----
From: Miko Matsumura [mailto:mmatsumura@infravio.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 7:24 AM
To: Michael Stiefel; Mark Little
Cc: soa-blueprints@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [soa-blueprints] links to implementations

Yes, I am proposing Monday Oct 3rd. I think the first and third Mondays
would work for meetings.
 
I'm interested in having a F2F for this TC at Infoworld SOA Executive
Forum in NYC on Nov 7, would others be interested in this venue?
 
Thanks,
Miko

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Michael Stiefel [mailto:development@reliablesoftware.com] 
	Sent: Tue 9/27/2005 7:15 AM 
	To: Mark Little; Miko Matsumura 
	Cc: soa-blueprints@lists.oasis-open.org 
	Subject: Re: [soa-blueprints] links to implementations
	
	

	I assume then we will not have a call on Thursday.
	
	Are you proposing Monday as the standard call day? I assume it
is better
	for everyone to know as far as possible in advance what the call
day will be.
	
	Michael
	
	At 10:02 AM 9/27/2005, Mark Little wrote:
	>That's fine with me, but under OASIS rules, unless the later
call is
	>formal, it wouldn't be sufficient to maintain voting rights.
Obviously if
	>it were formal and anyone who attended the prior meeting didn't
attend the
	>AsiaPac meeting, they'd then run the risk of losing voting
rights if they
	>missed the next formal meeting.
	>
	>Mark.
	>
	>
	>Miko Matsumura wrote:
	>
	>>Hi Everyone,
	>>
	>>Results from the informal poll are in:
	>>
	>>Quick Summary of Voting Results: - 8AM PST (GMT-008) received
13 Votes
	>>- 9AM PST received 18 Votes
	>>- 1PM PST received 7 Votes
	>>- 4PM PST received 3 Votes
	>>- 7PM PST received 0 Votes
	>>- 10PM PST received 3 Votes
	>>
	>>I think it's best that we go with 9AM Pacific Time, and we
hold perhaps
	>>a later informational call for AsiaPac...
	>>
	>>How would Monday October 3 be for a next call date?
	>>
	>>Best,
	>>Miko
	>>
	>>
	>
	>--
	>Mark Little
	>Chief Architect
	>Arjuna Technologies Ltd
	>www.arjuna.com
	>