[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [soa-blueprints] links to implementations
I'd like to (as I said on SOA-RM) consider the SOA-RM blueprints as being wider than just software I think 90%+ of the blueprints are equally applicable to pure business blueprints and would act as a good starting point for the minor modifications we need. I propose therefore that we ignore (for this group) the page 2 scoping statement and consider the SOA-RM to be our "starter for 10" on all SOA Blueprint areas whether Software or not. Otherwise we'll have 98 different definitions of service which won't translate well from Business->Project->Software->Infrastructure Steve PS A POA RM... isn't that the COBOL specification ? :) > -----Original Message----- > From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com] > Sent: 03 October 2005 16:38 > To: Jones, Steve G; soa-blueprints@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [soa-blueprints] links to implementations > > Steve: > > I don't think that this would pose any constraints upon the Blueprints > TC. The RM just focuses on software that can be used to implement any > requirements, such as electronic business patterns. Regardless, > Blueprints can use more than one reference model and may combine the SOA > RM with the OSI 7 layer reference model, a POA RM or others. > > Duane > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jones, Steve G [mailto:steve.g.jones@capgemini.com] > Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 8:34 AM > To: soa-blueprints@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [soa-blueprints] links to implementations > > > Could we have a quick discussion on the impact of the SOA-RM being > limited > to software (scope) on our ability to do business blueprints. > > Steve > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Miko Matsumura [mailto:mmatsumura@infravio.com] > > Sent: 30 September 2005 20:31 > > To: Duane Nickull; Jeffrey.Lamb@wellsfargo.com > > Cc: soa-blueprints@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject: RE: [soa-blueprints] links to implementations > > > > > Agenda will be primarily to discuss the contributed assets from The > > Middleware Company (the Generico Blueprints) and to set a path towards > > developing and evaluating additional contributions... > > > > > Best, > > Miko > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com] > > Sent: Fri 9/30/2005 8:57 AM > > To: Jeffrey.Lamb@wellsfargo.com; Miko Matsumura > > Cc: soa-blueprints@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject: RE: [soa-blueprints] links to implementations > > And agenda? > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jeffrey.Lamb@wellsfargo.com [mailto:Jeffrey.Lamb@wellsfargo.com] > > Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 7:45 AM > > To: mmatsumura@infravio.com > > Cc: soa-blueprints@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject: RE: [soa-blueprints] links to implementations > > > > > Is there a conference line number and participant code for the Monday > > October 3 meeting? > > Assuming, as stated below, it will be at 9am Pacific coast (US) time > > > > > > > > > This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential > and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the > person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, > you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, > distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this > message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all > copies of this message. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]