RE: [soa-blueprints] Joined the tc for...

["Beack, Theo" <Theo.Beack@softwareagusa.com>]

I agree Don.

The adoption blueprints should not contain any vendor specific
implementation details. 

Theo

-----Original Message-----
From: Don Flinn [mailto:flinn@alum.mit.edu] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 20:10
To: soa-blueprints@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [soa-blueprints] Joined the tc for...

It would bother me if an international consortium such as OASIS, would
produce a standard that contains vendor specific implementation
information.  IMHO anything that we produce MUST (RFC 2119) be totally
vendor neutral. 

Don 

On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 11:02 -0500, Michael Stiefel wrote:
> I thought that the SOA RM TC would provide a reference model for SOAs 
> and some reference architectures. The Blueprints group would provide 
> concrete architectures that could have some vendor specific
implementations.
> 
> Michael
> 
> At 09:56 AM 1/25/2006, marchadr@wellsfargo.com wrote:
> 
> >Each of use joined the TC for some reason what was it exactly?
> >
> >What did each of you expect to get or contribute from it?
> >
> >This is the real question it seems.
> >
> >- dan
> 
> 
> 
> 
--
Don Flinn
President, Flint Security LLC
Tel: 781-856-7230
Fax: 781-631-7693
e-mail: flinn@alum.mit.edu
http://flintsecurity.com