OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

soa-eerp message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [soa-eerp] I035: BSLA - Namespaces, normative references, andrationale


This is NOT OK to close - this is a substantive issue, and i031 is editorial. When that change is made, that part of i031 can be closed as well as this one.

The issue needs to be addressed.

bill
--
William Cox
Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
+1 862 485 3696 mobile
+1 908 277 3460 fax

eerp_sy@changfeng.org.cn wrote:
380-22009632471120866@M2W032.mail2web.com" type="cite">
There is only one reference on "protocol" on this BSLA spec and has been
already addressed on issue # I031. 

The issue should be closed due to duplicated. 


Szu Chang


Original Message:
-----------------
From: eerp_sy@changfeng.org.cn eerp_sy@changfeng.org.cn
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 03:20:27 -0400
To: wtcox@coxsoftwarearchitects.com, soa-eerp@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [soa-eerp] I035: BSLA - Namespaces, normative references, and
rationale


Issue # I035

For bSLA Spec only. 

Related issues: I033 and I034 

Original Message:
-----------------
From: William Cox wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:47:07 -0400
To: soa-eerp@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [soa-eerp] NEW Issue: Namespaces, normative references, and
rationale


PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSION THREAD UNTIL THE 
ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER.

The issues coordinators will notify the list when that has occurred.

Protocol: bqos rating sla

Artifact: spec

Type: design

Title: Namespaces, normative references, and rationale

Description:

This applies to all three specifications under review.

The normative list of namespaces cites CEFACT ccts but does not list it 
in the normative references.

The reasoning for the choice of namespaces, and in particular whether 
the UBL namespaces include ccts, is not clear. Address whether the CEFAC 
T namespace is included directly and within UBL, and briefly justify the 
choice.


Related issues:

Proposed Resolution:

Add normative reference for ccts schema as needed.

Add non-normative text  in Appendix B to explain the choice of 
namespaces and schemas used.


bill cox
--
*William Cox*
Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com 
<mailto:wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com>
Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
+1 862 485 3696 mobile
+1 908 277 3460 fax



--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web.com - Microsoft® Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 



--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web.com – What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you?
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/SharePoint



  


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]