[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Updated: (SOAEERP-30) PR07-T9 The term "thirdparty" in the Business Rating spec is problematic
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/SOAEERP-30?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
William Cox updated SOAEERP-30:
-------------------------------
Fix Version/s: cd04
Affects Version/s: cd03
> PR07-T9 The term "third party" in the Business Rating spec is problematic
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOAEERP-30
> URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/SOAEERP-30
> Project: OASIS Service-Oriented Architecture End-to-End Resource Planning (SOA-EERP) TC
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: PR01 Comments
> Affects Versions: cd03
> Reporter: Paul Yang
> Assignee: Szu Chang
> Fix For: cd04
>
>
> 10. The use of "third party" (e.g., in Rating lines 100) is problematic. Does the specification assert that only "third parties", which is taken to mean "parties unaffiliated with either the requester or the target of the rating request" will respond? The conformance clauses on this issue are extremely weak. This is another area where the overall architecture, in a normative form rather than a white paper, is essential to understanding.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]