Re: [soa-rm-comment] Feedback on the public review of the ReferenceArchitecture Foundation for Service Oriented Architecture

[Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com>]

All were deepl read and I think you'll find the abstract concepts  
represented. If we have missed any concepts, methodologies that are  
appropriate for this level of abstraction, please let us know.

D

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 13, 2010, at 1:54, "Kelvin Lawrence" <klawrenc@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Not in my official role as chair of the WS-SX TC but rather just  
> using that as background, I would like to post the following bit of  
> feedback to the TC for their consideration..
>
> Thanks in advance for your time.
>
> This comment comes from reading section 5.2 "Security Model"
>
> A considerable number of standards for security have been developed  
> and broadly implemented in many SOA solutions. These include, OASIS  
> standards such as WS-Security, WS-Trust, WS-SecureConversation,  
> SAML, XACML, WS-Federation and WS-I's Basic Security Profile. How do  
> the concepts and models defined in this section (5.2) align with  
> these existing security standards?"
>
>
> Cheers
> Kelvin
>
> Kelvin R. Lawrence
> Distinguished Engineer & CTO, Emerging Internet Software Standards
> IBM Software Group