Re: [soa-rm-editors] Proposed Dispositions

[Don Flinn <flinn@alum.mit.edu>]

Fellow Editors

If you have a PD and the creator of the issue has not responded to you
either -
i) Follow Duane's recommendation
or
ii) If you decide that the issue is with merit and have a PD, please
submit it adding Duane's caveat, modified as "Additional clarification
was requested; no response received; Editors Proposed Disposition"

Do you agree with this Duane?

Don

On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 09:36 -0700, Duane Nickull wrote:
> Hello Wes:
> 
> He is not on vacation and if he (or any other commenter) does not 
> respond by CoB today, I would recommend simply replying to the comment with
> 
> "Additional clarification was requested; no response received.  Comment 
> tabled"
> 
> Unless there is a clear way to address it without the clarification.  To 
> be fair, perhaps you could ping him today with this information to 
> ensure he is aware that unless he provides the input the comment is 
> subject to slip.
> 
> He is always free to re-submit the comments in the next round.
> 
> In time for the next conference call, I would like to suggest that we 
> compose a list of comment dispositions to work through as a TC and allow 
> people in advance to look at this.  perhaps we can get a new draft done 
> very soon.
> 
> Also - what is the proposed disposition of Gregory's comment regarding 
> figure 2-1 being too vacuous?  IMO - this precedes all other 
> dispositions since it impacts them.
> 
> Duane
> 
> McGregor.Wesley@tbs-sct.gc.ca wrote:
> 
> >I also posed some questions to Joe.
> >
> >He must be on vacation.
> >
> >Wes
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >From: 	Francis McCabe [mailto:fgm@fla.fujitsu.com] 
> >Sent:	June 8, 2005 11:44 AM
> >To:	Don Flinn
> >Cc:	soa-rm-editors
> >Subject:	Re: [soa-rm-editors] Proposed Dispositions
> >
> >I thought that the process involved first of all discussing the issue  
> >with the raiser of the issue.
> >
> >I have not submitted my dispositions because I have not had any  
> >response yet from Joe.
> >Frank
> >
> >On Jun 8, 2005, at 8:06 AM, Don Flinn wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Hi Fellow Editors
> >>
> >>So far I have received Proposed Dispositions (PDs) from Peter Brown,
> >>John Harby and Don Flinn.  I'm looking for an onslaught of PDs  
> >>today as
> >>this is our target date.
> >>
> >>If your PD is short (reasonable size for a Excel cell) send it with  
> >>the
> >>issue number.  If the PD is lengthy upload an email containing the  
> >>PD to
> >>Issues Lists / Dispositions / Draft 07 on the our TC members page.  I
> >>will then put a hyperlink to your email in the appropriate PD cell.
> >>Include the issue number in the email. See John Harby's PD in the  
> >>Draft
> >>07 folder for an example.
> >>
> >>If you have any question or problems please contact me.
> >>
> >>Don
> >>
> >>-- 
> >>Don Flinn
> >>President, Flint Security LLC
> >>Tel: 781-856-7230
> >>Fax: 781-631-7693
> >>e-mail: flinn@alum.mit.edu
> >>http://flintsecurity.com
> >>
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
-- 
Don Flinn
President, Flint Security LLC
Tel: 781-856-7230
Fax: 781-631-7693
e-mail: flinn@alum.mit.edu
http://flintsecurity.com