RE: [soa-rm-editors] Proposed Dispositions

[<McGregor.Wesley@tbs-sct.gc.ca>]

Hi Duane,

I understand Joe's comments sufficiently well enough to do the rewrite. I was making sure though he had the opportunity to express himself further should he so desire.

I fully agree with you that the diagram and its content precede all other discussions.  The old idiom that a "picture is worth a thousand words" is never more true than in this case.

Wes 


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com] 
Sent:	June 8, 2005 12:36 PM
To:	McGregor, Wesley
Cc:	fgm@fla.fujitsu.com; flinn@alum.mit.edu; soa-rm-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject:	Re: [soa-rm-editors] Proposed Dispositions

Hello Wes:

He is not on vacation and if he (or any other commenter) does not 
respond by CoB today, I would recommend simply replying to the comment with

"Additional clarification was requested; no response received.  Comment 
tabled"

Unless there is a clear way to address it without the clarification.  To 
be fair, perhaps you could ping him today with this information to 
ensure he is aware that unless he provides the input the comment is 
subject to slip.

He is always free to re-submit the comments in the next round.

In time for the next conference call, I would like to suggest that we 
compose a list of comment dispositions to work through as a TC and allow 
people in advance to look at this.  perhaps we can get a new draft done 
very soon.

Also - what is the proposed disposition of Gregory's comment regarding 
figure 2-1 being too vacuous?  IMO - this precedes all other 
dispositions since it impacts them.

Duane

McGregor.Wesley@tbs-sct.gc.ca wrote:

>I also posed some questions to Joe.
>
>He must be on vacation.
>
>Wes
>
> -----Original Message-----
>From: 	Francis McCabe [mailto:fgm@fla.fujitsu.com] 
>Sent:	June 8, 2005 11:44 AM
>To:	Don Flinn
>Cc:	soa-rm-editors
>Subject:	Re: [soa-rm-editors] Proposed Dispositions
>
>I thought that the process involved first of all discussing the issue  
>with the raiser of the issue.
>
>I have not submitted my dispositions because I have not had any  
>response yet from Joe.
>Frank
>
>On Jun 8, 2005, at 8:06 AM, Don Flinn wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Hi Fellow Editors
>>
>>So far I have received Proposed Dispositions (PDs) from Peter Brown,
>>John Harby and Don Flinn.  I'm looking for an onslaught of PDs  
>>today as
>>this is our target date.
>>
>>If your PD is short (reasonable size for a Excel cell) send it with  
>>the
>>issue number.  If the PD is lengthy upload an email containing the  
>>PD to
>>Issues Lists / Dispositions / Draft 07 on the our TC members page.  I
>>will then put a hyperlink to your email in the appropriate PD cell.
>>Include the issue number in the email. See John Harby's PD in the  
>>Draft
>>07 folder for an example.
>>
>>If you have any question or problems please contact me.
>>
>>Don
>>
>>-- 
>>Don Flinn
>>President, Flint Security LLC
>>Tel: 781-856-7230
>>Fax: 781-631-7693
>>e-mail: flinn@alum.mit.edu
>>http://flintsecurity.com
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>
>  
>