[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [soa-rm-editors] consolidated v11 issues andproposeddispositions
Duane: I think that's it. I'm hoping that it'll be a short call as I have a ton of stuff here, including promoting the RM in the eGovernment space later this week: more news soon Peter -----Original Message----- From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com] Sent: 07 February 2006 21:09 To: flinn@alum.mit.edu; peter@justbrown.net Cc: soa-rm-editors@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [soa-rm-editors] consolidated v11 issues andproposeddispositions For the agenda tomorrow, I think there are a few items we have to discuss. 1. SOA RA - approve SC? 2. SOA RM v 1.0 CD - candidate approved and ready to go on website. Path forward - do we want to make OASIS specification? Any items I have missed? Duane ******************************* Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT http://www.uncefact.org/ Chair - OASIS SOA Reference Model Technical Committee Personal Blog - http://technoracle.blogspot.com/ ******************************* -----Original Message----- From: Don Flinn [mailto:flinn@alum.mit.edu] Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 10:58 AM To: peter@justbrown.net Cc: 'soa-rm-editors' Subject: RE: [soa-rm-editors] consolidated v11 issues andproposeddispositions Sorry I guess sending documents from under my desk is not a good idea -:) Here are the figures in jpeg. Don On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 16:44 +0000, Peter F Brown wrote: > Don: > with what program(s) can you open these files: it won't open with Mind > Manager or Visio.... > > Peter > > -----Original Message----- > From: Don Flinn [mailto:flinn@alum.mit.edu] > Sent: 31 January 2006 15:22 > To: Ken Laskey > Cc: soa-rm-editors > Subject: Re: [soa-rm-editors] consolidated v11 issues and > proposeddispositions > > Hi > > Attached is my first cut at Cmaps with labels. I'm not yet happy with > the verbs I used, but I wanted to get something to the group for > comment. The busiest is the Service Interaction Concepts. To me, at > least, the labels give more meaning and understanding to the figures. > If these appear to be of some use I can send the Cmap files, that is > if people are using Cmap. > > (Scurry, succry - sounds of d flinn hiding under his desk in > anticipation of > an onslaught of flames :-) > > Don > > On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 20:56 -0500, Ken Laskey wrote: > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________ > > __ > > > > The attached spreadsheet combines my proposed dispositions, a new > > column for Frank's comments on those PDs, and an additional column > > with my further comments. I also included Peter's glossary comments > > (without issues numbers) at the end. With the new columns and text > > added, I color-coded the rows as follows: > > > > green - Frank accepted my PD or I am accepting his comment. There > > may be an additional comment for consideration when actually > > modifying the master copy (103). > > > > blue - The PDs and additional comment still need a little discussion > > to come to closure (12). > > > > red - This probably requires some nontrivial discussion (5). > > > > The numbers in parenthesis above represent the number of issues (out > > of the 120 total) falling into each category. Of the five red ones, > > four have to do with if/how to label the arcs in the figures. The > > other one was issue 446 which asked for some words for Figure 1. > > While I wasn't greatly inspired, I submit the following as a > > beginning for the text to augment lines 115-116. > > > > Figure 1 shows how a reference model for SOA relates to other > > distributed systems architectural inputs. The concepts and > > relationships defined by the reference model are intended to be the > > basis for describing references architectures and patterns that will > > define more specific categories of SOA designs. Concrete > > architectures will be derived from reference architectures and other > > related models, such as [can't think of example right now], will > > fulfill the needs for architectural work. Architecture is not done > > in isolation but must account for goals, motivation, and > > requirements that define the actual problems being addressed. While > > reference architectures can form the basis of classes of solutions, > > concrete architectures will define specific solution approaches. > > Architecture also builds on other infrastructure work, such as > > protocols, profiles, specifications, and standards. SOA > > implementations combine all of these, from the more generic > > architectural principles and infrastructure to the specifics that > > define the current needs, and represent specific implementations > > that will be built and used in an operational environment. > > > > Note, adding this text relieves the aesthetic problem for issue 445. > > > > One final note: I didn't comment on or color-code Peter's glossary > > issues and these are in addition to the 120, which already include > > several glossary items. I haven't had the fortitude to tackle the > > glossary :-) > > > > Ken > > > > P.S. I assume Frank still has control of the master document and > > will incorporate the changes. > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________ > > __ > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > > -------------------- > > Ken Laskey > > MITRE Corporation, M/S H305 phone: 703-983-7934 > > 7515 Colshire Drive fax: 703-983-1379 > > McLean VA 22102-7508 > -- > Don Flinn > President, Flint Security LLC > Tel: 781-856-7230 > Fax: 781-631-7693 > e-mail: flinn@alum.mit.edu > http://flintsecurity.com > > > -- Don Flinn President, Flint Security LLC Tel: 781-856-7230 Fax: 781-631-7693 e-mail: flinn@alum.mit.edu http://flintsecurity.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]