[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Coments on Views and Viewpoints
http://wiki.oasis-open.org/soa-rm/TheArchitecture/ViewsAndViewpoints I like the addition of a section that discusses various viewpoints of the system. This helps the reader understand that different elements in the architecture can have various meaningful relationships based on the particular viewpoint of the architecture. My suggestion is to move this section into the introduction or just below the introduction. There are numerous architectural styles and methodologies and architectural artifacts based on those styles and methodologies. Many variables go into the choice of how an architectural methodology is tailored to meet the needs of a project: type of problem being solved, size of the project, time, team size, team technical experience, budget, architects preferred architectural styles, etc. While the discussion of ANSI/IEEE standards can be informative, I would not make this a normative reference because of the need to recognize the many various architectural styles that can be used to build systems. Comments on Candidate Viewpoints for the SOA RA: Interface Viewpoint - Do others have thoughts on the direction this particular viewpoint could take in the RA. I do not see the RA going down to the level of discussing specific interfaces so I am relunctant at this point to make a case that would fit this viewpoint into the SOA RA. Information Viewpoint - Information Viewpoint could be expanded to something like an information sharing viewpoint. This would be inline with the Global Information Grid and could provide that group of people some hooks into the RA. Interaction Viewpoint - Already incorporated into the RA. Behavior Viewpoint (or Functional Viewpoint?) - Is the Behavior Viewpoint that much different than the Interaction Viewpoint? Aspects of behavior are also captured in Needs and Capabilities, Participants, and Real World Effect. Security Viewpoint - Already incorporated into the RA. Management Viewpoint - Already incorporated into the RA. Infrastructure Viewpoint (move Security and Management into infrastructure) - Infrastructure seems similar to the Enterprise SOA. The Enterprise SOA describes the architectural infrastructure elements. Would it be appropriate to create an Infrastructure Viewpoint at the level of the SOA RA or would it be more appropriate for a reference implementation architecture? Do we want to add an Internet SOA viewpoint and an Enterprise SOA viewpoint? Danny __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]