[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [soa-rm-ra] Thought Experiment on SOA Security and Governance
My take is that we would never reach the question of federated identity, because the chances of fraud (especially through a virus) are so high that it will probably be a very long time before Internet-based voting is a reality (if at all). Joe Joseph Chiusano Associate Booz | Allen | Hamilton ______________________-- 700 13th St. NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20005 O: 202-508-6514 C: 202-251-0731 Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com -----Original Message----- From: Michael Stiefel [mailto:development@reliablesoftware.com] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 9:40 AM To: soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [soa-rm-ra] Thought Experiment on SOA Security and Governance One of my action items was to come with a scenario that we could use to think about SOA Governance. Here is one "use case". Try to imagine what it would take for the United States to have secure Internet voting in state and federal elections. Who would offer the "voting service"? This would be the extreme case of Federated Identity. Would the state federated identity servers be trusted by the federal identity servers? I cannot imagine everybody getting an X509 certificate. Would we restrict voting to a few days? Comments? Michael
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]