[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [soa-rm-ra] quick thought on versioning and description
Fidelity Investments - Web Delivery
Phone: +44-173-783-6038
E-mail:
michael.poulin@uk.fid-intl.com
Web: http://www.fidelity.co.uk/
Important: Fidelity Investments International (Reg. No.1448245), Fidelity Investment Services Limited (Reg. No. 2016555), Fidelity Pensions Management (Reg. No. 2015142) and Financial Administration Services Limited (Reg. No. 1629709, a Fidelity Group company) are all registered in England and Wales, are authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Services Authority and have their registered offices at Oakhill House, 130 Tonbridge Road, Hildenborough, Tonbridge, Kent TN11 9DZ. Tel 01732 361144. Fidelity only gives information on products and does not give investment advice to private clients based on individual circumstances. Any comments or statements made are not necessarily those of Fidelity. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. All e-mails sent from or to Fidelity may be subject to our monitoring procedures. Direct link to Fidelity’s website -
http://www.fidelity-international.com/world/index.htmlI would say yes. While the myth of late binding has sort of been debunked, there are certain situations where auditable events updating a services description could be subscribed to by consumers and changes could automatically happen. Such instances would probably be limited to minor technical reconfigurations rather than wholesale changes in data models, yet we should definitely consider it a core function. Many people whining about service management talk about this but there is no clear convention on major version/minor version upgrade or what scheme would be used to denote such.
From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com]
Sent: 08 March 2007 17:38
To: Ken Laskey; soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [soa-rm-ra] quick thought on versioning and description
D
On 3/8/07 5:59 AM, "Ken Laskey" <klaskey@mitre.org> wrote:
Would it make sense to add a change log to description where the service provider would list changes that we decide do not constitute the need to update the service version? Would the version number of the service contain an extra field (thinking of this as an extension to Michael's paper) that indicated a log change but not really anything else?
Not sure where I'd go with this but wanted to capture the thought before it disappeared.
Ken
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ken Laskey
MITRE Corporation, M/S H305 phone: 703-983-7934
7515 Colshire Drive fax: 703-983-1379
McLean VA 22102-7508
--
**********************************************************
Sr. Technical Evangelist - Adobe Systems, Inc. *
Chair - OASIS SOA Reference Model Technical Committee *
Blog: http://technoracle.blogspot.com *
Music: http://www.mix2r.com/audio/by/artist/duane_nickull*
**********************************************************
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]