OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

soa-rm-ra message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [soa-rm-ra] Updated Visual Model for Service Description


The problem with propagating federated queries is if a query to federation 1 is propagated to federation 2 and then propagated from federation 2 to federation 3, then if a member of 3 is also a member of 1, you are in an infinite loop.  The ebXML 2.5 draft had this problem and they handled it in 3.0 by saying you could only propagate one level.  I noted there are other simple strategies one could use and was told that in the absence of compelling use and need, this restriction was sufficient for the first pass.

Ken

On Nov 6, 2007, at 8:57 AM, Poulin, Michael wrote:

I have one example from old CORBA world - there was/is so-called CORBA Object Trading Service ( a prototype of modern Web Services and UDDI ) and it had a concept of federated service repositories.
 
When one looked up for the service, it was possible to specify  the "depth of federation" where the service may be searched by the ORB (Broker), i.e. how many close neighbouring repositories (federated) should be searched through to find the service with specified characteristics.
 
This may be a meaning of "federate a single service"...
 
- Michael

Important: Fidelity Investments International (Reg. No.1448245), Fidelity Investment Services Limited (Reg. No. 2016555), Fidelity Pensions Management (Reg. No. 2015142) and Financial Administration Services Limited (Reg. No. 1629709, a Fidelity Group company) are all registered in England and Wales, are authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Services Authority and have their registered offices at Oakhill House, 130 Tonbridge Road, Hildenborough, Tonbridge, Kent TN11 9DZ. Tel 01732 361144. Fidelity only gives information on products and does not give investment advice to private clients based on individual circumstances. Any comments or statements made are not necessarily those of Fidelity. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. All e-mails sent from or to Fidelity may be subject to our monitoring procedures. Direct link to Fidelity’s website - http://www.fidelity-international.com/world/index.html



From: Rex Brooks [mailto:rexb@starbourne.com]
Sent: 06 November 2007 00:54
To: Ken Laskey; Danny Thornton
Cc: Jeffrey A. Estefan; soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [soa-rm-ra] Updated Visual Model for Service Description

At 7:35 PM -0500 11/5/07, Ken Laskey wrote:
So what would it mean to federate a single service.  Isn't that just being authorized and then using the service?

Now federating registries is usually federating queries across registries, and there are tons of things involved that I would say are outside the scope of the RA.  If you haven't seen the Discovery Service Reference Architecture from the IC SOA (and now joint with DoD) work, it has some real interesting aspects and some others that gloss over fundamental questions.  But that is for other discussions.

I will be interesting to see what happens. I think we'll be federating registries as well as services, so both types will need to be handled. Federating services seems the more straightforward unless the federated registries operate as a VPN. Also for other discussions.

Cheers,
Rex

Ken

On Nov 5, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Danny Thornton wrote:

This is off topic from federations, but JAXR is
implemented for Sun's Service Registry.  Sun's Service
Registry is one registry we are using for the Feb demo
that Rex mentioned.  I have that up and going at:

http://www.integratedresponseservices.net:6480/soar

Everything you can do with JAXR as a client app you
can do through the Registry web console.

I am now trying to figure out how our RA meta-model
fits into the ebXML RIM model which is what is
referenced in section 4 of the JAXR document.  If
anyone is interested, here is a link to the 3.0
version of the ebXML RIM document:

http://docs.oasis-open.org/regrep/v3.0/specs/regrep-rim-3.0-os.pdf

The ebXML Registry Information Model does define a
federation object but that is to federate an entire
registry with another registry.  I think federation at
this level is too course grained to solve a lot of the
cross ownership boundary issues that will be common to
the majority of people who jump into a SOA-ecosystem.
There are multiple granularity levels that the
federation problem can be approached from. 

Federation is an important concept and I wanted to get
other input about its placement in relation to our RA
Service Description.

Danny

--- "Jeffrey A. Estefan"
<jeffrey.a.estefan@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:

Danny,

Where are you going with this federation business???

Are you proposing something along the lines of the
Federated Enterprise
Reference Architecture (FERA) model?


http://xml.coverpages.org/SemantionSOA-Runtime200509.pdf

(See Section 3.0)

There was a big play in the ebXML world on this
(see, e.g.,
http://www.ebxmlsoft.com/papers/ebxml-fera.pdf) and
I saw it go nowhere when
I attended the OASIS Symposium up in San Francisco a
few years ago.  There
were briefings from the ebSOA TC folks and, again,
it has gone absolutely
nowhere.  In fact, I have not seen it referenced
anywhere outside this
community or even the analyst community.

I'm really worried that once again, we're getting
distracted and we NEED TO
FINISH THE RA!!!!!!  Our work has gone one far too
long in my opinion.  We
need to stay focused as a razor.

If you're looking to build out a tool for your
registry/repository, then you
should leverage the various service metadata
information models (IMs) out
there.  The IM described in JSR 93 (JAXR) is one of
the best I've seen.  And
it supports both UDDI and ebXML standards.  I've
attached a copy of the
original spec.  Check out Section 4 and in
particular, Fig. 11, which
provides a UML class diagram depicting the IM.

Cheers...

 - Jeff E.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave
the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group
and all your TCs in OASIS
at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ken Laskey
MITRE Corporation, M/S H305      phone: 703-983-7934
7151 Colshire Drive                         fax:       703-983-1379
McLean VA 22102-7508





Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:smime 634.p7s (    /    ) (0033555B)


-- 
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-898-0670


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ken Laskey
MITRE Corporation, M/S H305      phone: 703-983-7934
7151 Colshire Drive                         fax:       703-983-1379
McLean VA 22102-7508




smime.p7s



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]