Re: [soa-rm-ra] what is a generalized SOA RA?

["Jeffrey A. Estefan" <jeffrey.a.estefan@jpl.nasa.gov>]

Frank,

As I stated before, I object strongly to this new wordy addition.  And what 
section?  Are you talking about section 1.1?

What was wrong with our opening paragraph of section 1.1?  I thought 
everybody agreed it was a reasonable defn of a reference architecture (in 
the general sense) and its relationship to a reference model.

By all means, please DROP "design" from "architectural design pattern." 
There are architectural patterns and design patterns; not architectural 
design patterns.  But again, I don't see the value here.

I'd like to see any proposed addition or new subsection in context with the 
rest of Section 1  (Introduction) before passing any final judgments.  It's 
not clear to me what is being dropped and what is being added.

Could you send the latest draft of the proposed completed Section 1?

Thanks...

 - Jeff E.