[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm-ra] Follow-up to 7-5-08 Telecom
Michael, If I had the chance to modify line 552, I would change SERVICE to SERVICE INTERACTION. My interpretation is that the service being used is an element of the interaction, but the execution context in your example specifies not only the service but also critical elements of what it means to interact with the service when that interaction falls under UK jurisdiction. So I acknowledge what you want to cover but think the service interaction accomplishes that. Before I end, let me push on this from a different angle. If a process model makes use of several actions, I can look at separate service interactions as being what is necessary to accomplish each action or as a single multi-step interaction needed to accomplish the process. I don't believe we've ever clarified that, but I think my explanations lean toward the process interpretation. We made need to pursue that to answer your question. Ken On May 10, 2008, at 7:05 PM, michael.poulin@uk.fid-intl.com wrote:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ken Laskey MITRE Corporation, M/S H305 phone: 703-983-7934 7151 Colshire Drive fax: 703-983-1379 McLean VA 22102-7508 |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]