RE: [soa-rm-ra] Discussion of Ontology

[dellis <dellis@sandia.gov>]

Ken, Jeff, Frank

 

Here is a Governance/Policy  table for our discussion.  Jeff,  what is the best way to handle UML 2.0 “pre-condition” in our RA diagrams.

 

Dave

 

From: Jeffrey A. Estefan [mailto:jeffrey.a.estefan@jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 10:02 AM
To: soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [soa-rm-ra] Discussion of Ontology

 

Dave,

 

As you know, I suggested that we schedule a F2F in the not too distant future to address some of these harmonization and key concept issues.

 

Incidentally, guess the question also goes to Ken, what is the difference between our (RM's) notion of Execution Context and your notion of Service Engagement in the Protoge ontology diagram you sent out yesterday?  I don't see the value in adding yet another core concept that's not in the RM.

 

Cheers...

 

 - Jeff

Policy Type.docx