[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm-ra] willingness in joint action
Oh. Yes, "has" F. :) On Jun 24, 2009, at 6:56 PM, Rex Brooks wrote: > I wasn't referring to the dependences, but to the solid line > connector associations. > > Cheers, > Rex > > At 5:29 PM -0700 6/24/09, Francis McCabe wrote: >> I dont think that dependencies are usually named. What would you >> suggest for the names? >> On Jun 24, 2009, at 5:14 PM, Rex Brooks wrote: >> >>> Works better for me. Will the association between Willingness and >>> Actor and between Ability and Actor be named? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Rex >>> >>> At 4:33 PM -0700 6/24/09, Francis McCabe wrote: >>>> I have a new diagram... >>>> >>>> >>>> Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:Joint Actions 4.png >>>> (PNGf/«IC») (01789292) >>>> >>>> >>>> This focuses on the fact that an actor has ability (or not) and >>>> willingness (or not) and that joint action depend on both. >>>> I redrew the named association between joint actions and actions >>>> as a regular aggregation. >>>> >>>> Frank >>>> On Jun 24, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Rex Brooks wrote: >>>> >>>>> The dependency of Joint (or any kind of) Action on Willingness >>>>> is not clear in the diagram. That's why I modeled it as a >>>>> Dependency relationship of Willingness-Determination (as the >>>>> supplier) and Joint (or any kind of) Action (as the client) and >>>>> not an Association Class. However, as an Association Class it >>>>> can be applied to the relationship between an actor and any kind >>>>> of action. I like that. >>>>> >>>>> If there is a way to make the Association Class show dependency, >>>>> I'd be happier. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Rex >>>>> >>>>>> Sooo, while I agree that willingness is a kind of association >>>>>> class, I am uncomfortable with this diagram: >>>>>> >>>>>> Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:Joint Actions 3.png >>>>>> (PNGf/«IC») (01788EEC) >>>>>> >>>>>> for two reasons: Willingness is a noun and associations are >>>>>> predicates, and there are other important associations that >>>>>> could be drawn here, such as ability, authority, all kinds of >>>>>> stuff. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>> >>>>>> Frank >>>>>> >>>>>> Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:smime 1092.p7s ( / ) >>>>>> (01788EED) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Rex Brooks >>>>> President, CEO >>>>> Starbourne Communications Design >>>>> GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison >>>>> Berkeley, CA 94702 >>>>> Tel: 510-898-0670 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:smime 1094.p7s ( / ) >>>> (01789293) >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Rex Brooks >>> President, CEO >>> Starbourne Communications Design >>> GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison >>> Berkeley, CA 94702 >>> Tel: 510-898-0670 >> >> >> >> Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:smime 1095.p7s ( / ) >> (01789388) > > > -- > Rex Brooks > President, CEO > Starbourne Communications Design > GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison > Berkeley, CA 94702 > Tel: 510-898-0670 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]