[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm-ra] Re: Non Repudiation & Confidentiality in Figure 52
Understood, Michael, There's more than enough room for interpretation. Cheers, Rex mpoulin@usa.com wrote: > Rex, > > I read the definitions you provided a bit differently than you. > > In both cases, the is a *PARTY* and a result of the *PARTY*'s action, not Action per se. > > For Non Repudiation, we need the document/transmission the fact of existence of which is repudiated (or not) > > For Confidentiality, we need an info that is supposed to be protected from others. > > How transmission/into 'happened', i.e. the Action, does not matter IMO. > > - Michael > > > ================================== > Subject: Non Repudiation & Confidentiality in Figure 52 > > * From: Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com> > * To: "soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org RA" <soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org> > * Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:04:50 -0700 > -- Rex Brooks President, CEO Starbourne Communications Design GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison Berkeley, CA 94702 Tel: 510-898-0670
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]