response to additional comments [was: comments on 20090408 trust]

["Laskey, Ken" <klaskey@mitre.org>]

Attached are some comments I made four months ago on things like goal adoption and accountability.  These are relevant to review.

At the same time as this was originally sent, there was discussion of delegates and, in particular, a delegate who would act as a trusted intermediary with the goal of realizing the RWE of the delegating party.  This grew out of the diagrams Dave and I drew on the board at the end of our last face-to-face and where accountability entered the discussion.  That material seems to have been lost but it is the special case where goal adoption and accountability are relevant.

Ken

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Laskey [mailto:klaskey@mitre.org] 
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2009 11:25 PM
To: soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org RA
Subject: comments on 20090408 trust

Frank,

I was going through the latest trust write-up with the intent of  
incorporating some of the UML models I proposed but I notice we still  
have some significant disconnects.  The attached has my major comments.

A major point I strongly advocate is we connect the discussion through  
the idea of real world effects and avoid introducing other undefined  
terms when RWE can suffice.  This grounds us back in the RM.

Lots of other specifics.

Ken

trust 20090408 comments.doc

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ken Laskey
MITRE Corporation, M/S H305      phone: 703-983-7934
7515 Colshire Drive                         fax:       703-983-1379
McLean VA 22102-7508