[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [soa-rm-ra] previous objections to Delegate
Sold. I believe we have exceeded the 80% threshold intended
by the original comment. Ken From: Francis McCabe [mailto:fmccabe@gmail.com] I want to keep the original
sentiment. However, the English is poor. I suggest: Note
that the normal situation is where participants are either human or
organizations; but it is possible to envisage participants that are
purely automatic The reason is straightforward: we
should not eliminate scenarios where participants are actually agents (in the
sense of autonomous agents). In some cases entire ecosystems will be populated
with such agents. None of the architecture actually depends on participants
being human. On Aug 16, 2010, at 3:38 PM, Ken
Laskey wrote:
I had an action to clarify my concerns
relative to the current text. As it turns out, most of the text I
objected to has been removed, which is why the comment did not seem to
fit. My only remaining issue is lines 712-714 is a remnant from what was
otherwise deleted and is now confusing on its own. I would suggest
deleting “Note that we admit non-human participants that have no identifiable
representative as an extreme case: the normal situation is where participants are either human or organizations.” Ken --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Kenneth Laskey MITRE Corporation, M/S
H305
phone: 703-983-7934 7515 Colshire
Drive
fax: 703-983-1379 McLean VA 22102-7508 |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]