Rex is right. It is a map, not a definition.
On Nov 12, 2010, at 8:31 AM, Rex Brooks wrote:
I think most of you are missing the point. This is a descriptive,
introductory device not a structural analysis and is, I believe, not
intended to be in any sense prescriptive. We just want to get the
reader's feet wet with some basic concepts that are important
throughout the whole of the rest of the Section as well as the
Ecosystem.
Of course, Frank may say that i'm completely off base.
Cheers,
Rex
On 11/12/10 1:58 AM, mpoulin@usa.com wrote:
8CD50673CC47E51-C44-1AB66@web-mmc-m03.sysops.aol.com" type="cite">Maybe I
do not get something, but interactions (lines) between Actor
and Action, as well as between Actor and Real Wold and
Action and Real World appear rather strange to
me because they bypass Semantics. I am not saying that all
mentioned participants always share the same semantics but
each of them certainly has its own (at least).
I would
put Semantics into the center of the diagram, connected
all others to it and removed direct peripheral lines
between them.
- Michael
|