Re: [soa-rm-ra] Issues against Sections 4.2, 4.4, & 5.2

I have to look into section 4.1.1.2 again (while I agree that Figure 46 needs corrections) before making my opinion.

However, I certainly disagree with the proposal to remove Section 5.4, SOA Testing Model. If you prefer, I can make a definition of SOA Testing Environment.

I insist on this section because the majority of problems with actual SOA projects roots in inappropriate testing for services; it is quite different than

traditional testing as in the sphere of tools as in the sphere of environment. Moreover, particular testing for services affects service development a great deal.

If testing is organised right, the development will have much less chances to screw the projects.

If the testing things are not in the standard, anyone can write another White Paper on our White Paper and fully 'compensate' our recommendations.

- Michael

-----Original Message-----
From: Danny Thornton <danny_thornton2@yahoo.com>
To: soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org
Sent: Mon, Nov 29, 2010 5:41 am
Subject: [soa-rm-ra] Issues against Sections 4.2, 4.4, & 5.2

There are no outstanding issues against Section 4.2, Service Visibility Model, 
Section 4.4, Policies and Contracts Modek, and Section 5.2, Security Model.  

Since the PR2 release, Section 4.4, Policies and Contracts, had pieces cut and 
placed into section 3 and also had a significant rewrite.  Section 4.4 now has 
an emphasis on policy framework and enforcement.  Figure 46 is no longer in sync 
with the text and needs to be rediagrammed.

I recommend the following updates to the RAF:
1) Removal of Section 4.1.1.2 Assigning Values to Description Instances.
The data structures for service description vary depending on the implementation 
constraints or expressive needs of the description.  Section 4.1.1.2 will not 
apply to the actual structure of many service descriptions.

2) Removal of Section 5.4, SOA Testing Model.
The SOA Testing Model does not have diagrams or definitions.  It does have good 
information and I would recommend this as a referenced white paper in the RAF.  
Issues with Section 5.4 have been noted in previous emails.

3) Update of Section 5.3, Management.

Danny




      

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

soa-rm-ra message