[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [soa-rm-ra] Review of 21 Dec 2010 Editors' Draft of SOA-RAF
Random comments What happen to the SOA
definition, that Ken, Michael and myself were working on? It disappeared We still keep mixing resources
and services, although they are DIFFERENT SOA != ROA 3.5.1 will upset both
RESTofanians and SOA proponents. Owning and managing SOA - is it
really a process viewpoint Separation of concerns is a well
established principle in software architecture, while distinction of concerns
is a new one When talking about service
consumers and providers (860) it sounds like a service is created to satisfy
needs of a specific consumer, which does mot sound right. Semantic engagement piece does
not seem right. Semantic is on the messaging level, so your example is not
right From: Peter F Brown
[mailto:peter@peterfbrown.com] All: The last meeting of the TC started the
discussion on the new editors’ draft of the RAF. The draft minutes of the
meeting, posted yesterday, show the issues that were covered. Although no formal decision has yet been
made to adopt the latest draft as the “reference text”, we are
currently working on the assumption that *at least* the editorial, style
and typo changes have been accepted. For reference, a pdf of the text with *only*
these ancillary changes tracked and marked (compared with the 17 Nov text) has
been loaded to our TC workspace [1]. As a matter of due diligence, we invite
any TC member to comment before the next meeting on these ancillary changes or
forever hold their peace. Please include the mention “ancillary changes
comment” in the subject line of any post to the list. Chris and I are also now collecting
comments and feedback on the “Main Changes” draft (the draft posted
that assumes the ancillary changes as accepted [2]). We have already noted all
the remarks made at the 22nd Dec meeting and some sent privately by
the chair. We are now explicitly looking for further, new, feedback and
comments from the whole TC. Please include the mention “ain changes
comment” in your post. In either case, please refer to the line
numbers of the respective pdf documents. [1] Ancillary changes document – http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm-ra/download.php/40652/ [2] Main changes document – http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm-ra/download.php/40638/ Best regards, Peter Peter F Brown Independent
Consultant Transforming
our Relationships with Information Technologies P.O. Box
49719, Los Angeles, CA 90049, USA Tel:
+1.310.694.2278 Until 9
Jan 2011, Tel : +32.472.027.811 The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy of it from your computer or paper files. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]