OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

soa-rm-ra message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [soa-rm-ra] Service non-definition


How about make it simple for everyone

Service is an implementation of a well-defined business functionality accessible through a well-defined interface.

 

From: mpoulin@usa.com [mailto:mpoulin@usa.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 3:55 AM
To: soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [soa-rm-ra] Service non-definition

 

I cannot accept this definition, Peter, sorry. Why would not we use Ken's expression directly?

 

Here is why I dislike the definition below:

 

1) service and result are too much different things; service delivers result like any function, but it is not a result itself. Service=result is terribly confusing to me!

 

2) I do not accept that a service is always a process. I am involved now in a a wide discussion about ACM vs. BPM - adaptive case management vs. process management  -  and the common agreement that we may not call 'process' everything we do because process is only structured set of actions. Also, both process and actions are 'doing' while I insist on that a service is a thing, which can 'do'. Going further into Business SOA, service is a business unit providing business functionality and delivering the results (and RWE).

- Michael

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter F Brown <peter@peterfbrown.com>
To: soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org
Sent: Fri, Jan 14, 2011 10:43 pm
Subject: [soa-rm-ra] Service non-definition

How does this sound:

 

“A ‘service’ can be variously understood as ‘some result delivered’ as well as the ‘process’ or indeed the abstract ‘thing’ involved in delivering that result. Where the term service is used in this document, it is in the common sense way which may cover any or all of these concepts. Where one or other explicit senses it intended, and in order to avoid possible ambiguity, more explicit terms (including Real World Effect, Service Activity, Capability and System) will be used in line with the definitions in the Reference Model.”

 

I would propose adding this to the end of the second para of section 1.2:

 

Does this help?

 

Peter F Brown

Independent Consultant

Transforming our Relationships with Information Technologies

Web         www.peterfbrown.com

Blog          pensivepeter.wordpress.com

LinkedIn  www.linkedin.com/in/pensivepeter

Twitter     @pensivepeter

P.O. Box 49719, Los Angeles, CA 90049, USA

Tel: +1.310.694.2278

Tel: +1.310.694.2278

 


The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy of it from your computer or paper files.



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]