OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

soa-rm-ra message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [soa-rm-ra] rough non-UML orchestration and choreography figures


The more I am listening to this discussion the more I am getting confused. What are we actually trying to tell?

If I look at Ken’s picture, the only thing that I see is centralized vs distributed orchestration controller – implementation details, who cares. We said before that orchestration engine is an implementation approach, nothing else. So it can’t be distinguishing factor.

When I am looking at Mike’s picture, I am confused even more.

Here is a couple of suggestions:

·         There are two different types of business processes – sequential processes, the ones that was discussed all over the places, including BPEL and the ones that are defined as FSM (IBM and MS have implementations). Here the process is defined not in the terms of sequence of steps, but rather in the form of collection of states and states transition rules

·         There are two different types of service execution – complete and conversational. In the first case an execution is completely opaque, while conversational execution exposes its states that can impact further execution.

·         And finally we talked about message exchange vs execution sequence

So which one do we care about?

 

From: soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Mike Poulin
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 2:24 AM
To: Ken Laskey; soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: jeffrey.a.estefan@jpl.nasa.gov; Thornton, Danny R (IS); ellis@deccs.com
Subject: Re: [soa-rm-ra] rough non-UML orchestration and choreography figures

 

Here is my idea of 'choreography' diagram.

Specifics:
1) choreography does not need to be sequential
2) preiminary  off-line agreement is required from every participant
3) every participant generates its own RWE
4) messages are less important than interactions


 - Michael

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Ken Laskey

Sent: 01/06/12 10:48 PM

To: soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org

Subject: [soa-rm-ra] rough non-UML orchestration and choreography figures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Have at it.

 

 

 

 

 

Ken

 

 

 

 

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

Dr. Kenneth Laskey

 

 

MITRE Corporation, M/S H305              phone: 703-983-7934

 

 

7515 Colshire Drive                                    fax:        703-983-1379

 

 

McLean VA 22102-7508

 

 

 

 

 

 



The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy of it from your computer or paper files.


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]