RE: [soa-rm-ra] rough non-UML orchestration and choreography figures

Michael,

Notwithstanding Boris’ comments, I like it. I want to chew on it a bit more but I’d say the next step is to see what current text addresses this and what additional text might be needed. The trick is whether this holds together when we try to explain it. I think some of Boris’ points naturally show up in the explanation.

What do others think?

Ken

From: Mike Poulin [mailto:mpoulin@usa.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 3:24 AM
To: Ken Laskey; soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: jeffrey.a.estefan@jpl.nasa.gov; Thornton, Danny R (IS); ellis@deccs.com
Subject: Re: [soa-rm-ra] rough non-UML orchestration and choreography figures

Here is my idea of 'choreography' diagram.

Specifics:
1) choreography does not need to be sequential
2) preiminary off-line agreement is required from every participant
3) every participant generates its own RWE
4) messages are less important than interactions

- Michael

----- Original Message -----
From: Ken Laskey
Sent: 01/06/12 10:48 PM
To: soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [soa-rm-ra] rough non-UML orchestration and choreography figures

Have at it.

Ken

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr. Kenneth Laskey

MITRE Corporation, M/S H305 phone: 703-983-7934

7515 Colshire Drive fax: 703-983-1379

McLean VA 22102-7508

soa-rm-ra message