Subject: FW: review needed of new section 3.1
Thanks for the feedback. You provide a good combination of having history but also being removed from the recent discussions. That gives you perspective while also a bit of distance to ensure we haven’t headed down a blind alley.
Also thanks for your offer of updating the models. You see we have just used sketches while sorting out ideas, so there will definitely be a need for new models and updates. We’ll let you know when we’re stable enough to make use of your offer.
Ken and Peter. Forgot and replied to the raf list, which of course bounced. So below is a copy of my response. Cheers! - Jeff
Good additions Ken and Peter. Let me know when you reach a steady-state on the various changes and I’ll create a new set of diagrams if you need me to. Cheers! Also, in the footer and the filename, you are still using “soa-ra-xxx”. Is the plan to stick with that or move to to “soa-raf-xxx”? - J