I had
an Outlook crash, so I’m sending again with a
revised subject.
Ken
All,
Please look over the material
uploaded by Peter. On Wednesday, I’d like to vote
on accepting the responses to the outstanding issues
and to declare that we have addressed all comments
submitted against the last public review. I would
then like to set a schedule for
1. subcommittee review so we can
submit to the full TC
2. notice to the full TC for a
meeting to approve a new Committee Specification and
a new public review
3. new public review and, in
particular, how long of a review.
The Public Review length
should take into account people being away for
summer.
Chet and Jamie – if you are
lurking, how long is it now taking from request for
a public review to the documents being ready to go
out?
I
am assuming the meeting this Wednesday (July 11)
will begin at noon ET so I can cover the IEEE call.
Happy reading.
Ken
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Kenneth Laskey
MITRE Corporation, M/S
H305 phone: 703-983-7934
7515 Colshire
Drive
fax: 703-983-1379
McLean VA 22102-7508
Hi
guys,
Attached
is a doc and pdf copy of the latest draft , WD08.
This contains:
-
All the figure updates;
-
All the Architectural
Implications sections updates;
-
The agreed, revised
section on Composition, business processes and
collaboration;
-
The new section on
Identity and Access Control, from Kevin Smith, as
discussed at the last two meetings;
-
Updated appendix D;
-
Updates to ToC, list of
figures and Index
In
addition, is a snapshot of the Issues List, with all
remaining open and ongoing work issues now resolved.
These are all included now in the first sheet under
“Recommend to Close” (20 Issues).
If
we close those issues and agree the text, I think we
are done.
I
would certainly support a motion to confirm that at
this coming Wednesday’s meeting.
I
have loaded all the documents together on Kavi as a
.zip file: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm-ra/download.php/46435/SOA-RAF-v0.8.zip
and
it is this file that we should reference in
any decision and recommendation to the full RM for
approval.
The
next steps would be:
-
Getting full RM TC to
adopt the text as new draft; to agree to publish
this as a new Public Review (realistically, we
should go for 30 days, given the extent of the
changes);
-
If there are nothing
but minor changes requested in the review period
(and we take those on board), the RM TC could
proceed to a vote to adopt the text as a Committee
Specification;
-
Once that has been
done, we would need to look for three examples of
use of the RAF out in the wild among OASIS members
or beyond, and if we collect three statements of
use, we can ask for an OASIS-wide membership ballot
to approve the specification as an OASIS Standard.
P.O. Box
49719, Los Angeles, CA 90049, USA
Phone : (310)
694-2278