OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

soa-rm-ra message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [soa-rm-ra] Sec4-ArchitecturalImplicationsRe: [soa-rm-ra] agenda this week [was: [soa-rm-ra] Latest (Last?) draft of the RAF]


Rex,

I can confirm that I had received this from Ken and all your edits (bar a couple minor editorial changes, for consistency) were incorporated in the WD08

 

Peter


From: soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org [soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org] on behalf of Rex Brooks [rex.brooks@ncoic.org]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 16:41
To: soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [soa-rm-ra] Sec4-ArchitecturalImplicationsRe: [soa-rm-ra] agenda this week [was: [soa-rm-ra] Latest (Last?) draft of the RAF]

Hi Everyone,

I  didn't find a message from in my Sent box to confirm that I had already sent you all the attached Section 4 that consititutes my first pass at full Architectural Implications for Sections 4.1.4, 4.2.3, 4.3.6, and 4.4.3.

Cheers,
Rex


On 7/8/2012 7:49 PM, Ken Laskey wrote:

I had an Outlook crash, so I’m sending again with a revised subject. 

 

Ken

 

From: Ken Laskey [mailto:klaskey@mitre.org]
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2012 10:47 PM
To: 'Peter F Brown'; 'soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org'
Subject: RE: [soa-rm-ra] Latest (Last?) draft of the RAF

 

All,

 

Please look over the material uploaded by Peter.  On Wednesday, I’d like to vote on accepting the responses to the outstanding issues and to declare that we have addressed all comments submitted against the last public review.  I would then like to set a schedule for

1.       subcommittee review so we can submit to the full TC

2.       notice to the full TC for a meeting to approve a new Committee Specification and a new public review

3.       new public review and, in particular, how long of a review.

The Public Review length should take into account people being away for summer.

 

Chet and Jamie – if you are lurking, how long is it now taking from request for a public review to the documents being ready to go out?

 

I am assuming the meeting this Wednesday (July 11) will begin at noon ET so I can cover the IEEE call.

 

Happy reading.

 

Ken

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr. Kenneth Laskey

MITRE Corporation, M/S H305              phone: 703-983-7934

7515 Colshire Drive                                    fax:        703-983-1379

McLean VA 22102-7508

 

From: soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Peter F Brown
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2012 4:05 PM
To: soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [soa-rm-ra] Latest (Last?) draft of the RAF

 

Hi guys,

Attached is a doc and pdf copy of the latest draft , WD08. This contains:

-          All the figure updates;

-          All the Architectural Implications sections updates;

-          The agreed, revised section on Composition, business processes and collaboration;

-          The new section on Identity and Access Control, from Kevin Smith, as discussed at the last two meetings;

-          Updated appendix D;

-          Updates to ToC, list of figures and Index

 

In addition, is a snapshot of the Issues List, with all remaining open and ongoing work issues now resolved. These are all included now in the first sheet under “Recommend to Close” (20 Issues).

 

If we close those issues and agree the text, I think we are done.

I would certainly support a motion to confirm that at this coming Wednesday’s meeting.

 

I have loaded all the documents together on Kavi as a .zip file: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm-ra/download.php/46435/SOA-RAF-v0.8.zip

and it is this file that we should reference in any decision and recommendation to the full RM for approval.

 

The next steps would be:

-          Getting full RM TC to adopt the text as new draft; to agree to publish this as a new Public Review (realistically, we should go for 30 days, given the extent of the changes);

-          If there are nothing but minor changes requested in the review period (and we take those on board), the RM TC could proceed to a vote to adopt the text as a Committee Specification;

-          Once that has been done, we would need to look for three examples of use of the RAF out in the wild among OASIS members or beyond, and if we collect three statements of use, we can ask for an OASIS-wide membership ballot to approve the specification as an OASIS Standard.

 

Description: Description: Description:
                        Description: Description: Description:
                        cid:image013.jpg@01CCBA50.522AFA00

Peter F Brown

Independent Consultant

web: www.peterfbrown.com

twitter: @pensivepeter

 

P.O. Box 49719, Los Angeles, CA 90049, USA

Phone : (310) 694-2278

 



-- 
Rex Brooks
GeoAddress: 
1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Phone: 510-898-0670


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]