I had an Outlook crash, so I’m sending again with a revised subject.
Ken
All,
Please look over the material uploaded by Peter. On Wednesday, I’d like to vote on accepting the responses to the outstanding issues and to declare that we have addressed all comments
submitted against the last public review. I would then like to set a schedule for
1.
subcommittee review so we can submit to the full TC
2.
notice to the full TC for a meeting to approve a new Committee Specification and a new public review
3.
new public review and, in particular, how long of a review.
The Public Review length should take into account people being away for summer.
Chet and Jamie – if you are lurking, how long is it now taking from request for a public review to the documents being ready to go out?
I am assuming the meeting this Wednesday (July 11) will begin at noon ET so I can cover the IEEE call.
Happy reading.
Ken
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Kenneth Laskey
MITRE Corporation, M/S H305 phone: 703-983-7934
7515 Colshire Drive fax: 703-983-1379
McLean VA 22102-7508
Hi guys,
Attached is a doc and pdf copy of the latest draft , WD08. This contains:
-
All the figure updates;
-
All the Architectural Implications sections updates;
-
The agreed, revised section on Composition, business processes and collaboration;
-
The new section on Identity and Access Control, from Kevin Smith, as discussed at the last two meetings;
-
Updated appendix D;
-
Updates to ToC, list of figures and Index
In addition, is a snapshot of the Issues List, with all remaining open and ongoing work issues now resolved. These are all included now in the first sheet under “Recommend to Close” (20 Issues).
If we close those issues and agree the text, I think we are
done.
I would certainly support a motion to confirm that at this coming Wednesday’s meeting.
I have loaded all the documents together on Kavi as a .zip file:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm-ra/download.php/46435/SOA-RAF-v0.8.zip
and it is this file that we should reference in any decision and recommendation to the full RM for approval.
The next steps would be:
-
Getting full RM TC to adopt the text as new draft; to agree to publish this as a new Public Review (realistically, we should go for 30 days, given the extent of the changes);
-
If there are nothing but minor changes requested in the review period (and we take those on board), the RM TC could proceed to a vote to adopt the text as a Committee Specification;
-
Once that has been done, we would need to look for three examples of use of the RAF out in the wild among OASIS members or beyond, and if we collect three statements of use, we can ask for an OASIS-wide membership ballot
to approve the specification as an OASIS Standard.
P.O. Box 49719, Los Angeles, CA 90049, USA
Phone : (310) 694-2278