OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

soa-rm message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Proposed Role Descriptions for SOA-RM Editors


Rich,

You're right that someone has to drive, maybe we should just rotate 
responsibilities.  It sure would be nice to have perforce, cvs or 
subversion available to us.

I think we just need a process, and here is what I am thinking:

1. One person "drives" the task of developing the specification 
outline.  By drive, I mean, commits the outline to a document and 
revises based on TC consensus.
2. Parallel to the outline development, editing team decides on 
document format and process, develops prelim schedule.
3. Outline potentially becomes a "master document" -- containing the 
ToC and boilerplate stuff.
4. Work from the outline is split up, individual editors work on their 
chunk(s) of work and keep them updated in Kavi using some kind of 
naming scheme (e.g. s1_Introduction.(doc|xml))
5. Master spec custodian (1 month shifts?) integrates individual chunks 
to the master specification every 2-4 weeks, and issues a "draft" for 
general consumption.

That's my idea of how this should go.

-matt

On 23-Mar-05, at 8:59 AM, Rich Salz wrote:

>> In fact, I am not in favor of having multiple "editors".  I am,
>> however, all for having multiple "authors".
>
> Conventionaly, the WG members are the authors, and those who do most of
> the text management, often incorporating directly text sent from the 
> WG,
> are the editors.
>
> As for the "chief" question, I propose the editors work it out amongst
> themselves.  I'll offer the suggestion that there should always be 
> someone
> "in charge" so everyone has the clear expectation as to who owns the
> definitive copy.  This *will* come up; someone will ask "is that in the
> latest draft", and it will be frustrating to have email from n-1 
> editors
> saying "I didn't do it" and the n'th say "yes", or, more likely, "was 
> that
> my task?" Perhaps it should rotate on some basis.  Or if there are
> multiple documents, divide accordingly.
> 	/r$
> -- 
> Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
> DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
> XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
>



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]