RE: [soa-rm] Groups - Draft Position Paper (Kohring) (ccrle-position_05-03.pdf) uploaded

[<tmathews@lmi.org>]

I agree with Matt.  We should use UML for the normative definition of
the SOA reference model.  This will fit in nicely with some of the
existing data model specializations and potentially map to several EA
frameworks.

Thanks,
TM 

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew MacKenzie [mailto:mattm@adobe.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 9:40 AM
To: kohring@ccrl-nece.de
Cc: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Groups - Draft Position Paper (Kohring)
(ccrle-position_05-03.pdf) uploaded

Dr. Kohring,

Thanks for submitting a paper.  I am in favour of using UML to define
the reference model and feel that both formal and informal definitions
can happily coexist.

Respectfully,

Matt MacKenzie
Adobe Systems

kohring@ccrl-nece.de wrote:

>Draft position paper.
>
> -- Dr Gregory Kohring
>
>The document named Draft Position Paper (Kohring)
>(ccrle-position_05-03.pdf) has been submitted by Dr Gregory Kohring to 
>the OASIS SOA Reference Model TC document repository.
>
>Document Description:
>
>
>View Document Details:
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm/document.php?docume
>nt_id=11979
>
>Download Document:  
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm/download.php/11979/
>ccrle-position_05-03.pdf
>
>
>PLEASE NOTE:  If the above links do not work for you, your email 
>application may be breaking the link into two pieces.  You may be able 
>to copy and paste the entire link address into the address field of
your web browser.
>
>-OASIS Open Administration
>  
>