[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [soa-rm] On UML
This web site: SearchWebServices.com [searchWebServices@lists.techtarget.com] has a timely batch of articles that may provide insight from the business and technical communities. Latest issue contains: IN THIS ISSUE: > SOA -- Top down or bottom up approach? > Infravio to manage mainframe Web services > W3C continues work on binary XML > More headlines > How to identify, specify and realize services for your SOA > XML Performance and Size Regards, Tom Merkle CapWIN: www.capwin.org Phone: (301) 614-3720 Cell Phone: (240) 375-1966 Fax: (301) 614-0581 e-mail: tmerkle@capwin.org CapWIN 6305 Ivy Lane Suite 300 Capital Office Park Greenbelt, MD 20770 -----Original Message----- From: Don Flinn [mailto:flinn@alum.mit.edu] Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 11:30 AM To: Metz Rebekah Cc: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [soa-rm] On UML Metz You have presented a good list of audience categories. I would like to hone in on category 2. A Service Oriented Architecture is focused on solving business problems. As a consequence the major player in designing an Architecture will be the business analyst. Thus if we don't produce a reference model that speaks to and is understood by the business analyst - we will have failed. This does not mean that we can or will neglect the other categories (after all is said and done I'm a card-carrying techie). My point is, as technical people for the most part, we have to make the effort to produce a document that speaks equally to the business analyst. Don
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]