[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] SOA-RM Outline and Glossary
Thomas, Without reading it, I am repelled by it. Can you summarize what WSA did? Thanks, Matt Thomas Erl wrote: > Frank, > > For those members not familiar with the W3C Web Services Architecture > document, could you share your thoughts as to what would go in a > potential "Stakehohlder's Perspectives" section for the SOA-RM? > > Thomas > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Francis McCabe" <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com> > To: "Thomas Erl" <terl@serviceorientation.org> > Cc: <soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org> > Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 9:11 AM > Subject: Re: [soa-rm] SOA-RM Outline and Glossary > > >> +1 >> Frank >> >> On Apr 10, 2005, at 11:30 PM, Thomas Erl wrote: >> >>> During our last conference call Frank McCabe suggested that we consider >>> using the W3C Web Services Architecture (http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-arch/) >>> document's outline as the basis for our reference model outline. The >>> parent >>> level sections of this outline are as follows: >>> >>> 1 Introduction >>> 2 Concepts and Relationships >>> 3 Stakeholder's Perspectives >>> 4 Conclusions >>> >>> The W3C supplements this document with a separate glossary. As per >>> Ken's >>> suggestion, we may want to consider adding a glossary as a fifth >>> section or as an appendix. >>> >>> Thomas >>> >>> >> > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]