[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] SOA-RM Outline and Glossary
I don't think we should include "why we didn't" sections in the normative part of the specifciation, or even applied RM sections (WS-*). These should be in separate documents, IMO. -Matt Francis McCabe wrote: > Potential stakeholder's perspectives > > This is where we directly address our audiences: > > 1. SOA for busy executives > i.e., what are the benefits of SOA, what architectural constraints > are *of the essence* and how to use the RM. > 2. SOA and security > i.e., explaining why security per se is not a direct part of the > RM, but how different security considerations may be layered on top > and how that fits with the overall structure. > This one is also good for another reason: anyone wishing to ensure > some -ility on their particular architecture will want to know how to > map their requirements on to what is offered. > 3. SOA for developers > I.e., what are the primary constraints implied by the architecture > -- as well as those that are *not* implied. How is scalability > achieved in the RM and what you need to look out for in order to > achieve scalability in your architecture. More generally, how should > you ensure that your architecture is a good example of an SOA. How to > fold legacy stove-pipes into you new SOA systems. > 4. SOA for Web services > I.e., how does the RM differ from Web services, how do the WS-* > specs fit into the RM framework. > > Frank > > > > On Apr 11, 2005, at 1:04 PM, Thomas Erl wrote: > >> Frank, >> >> For those members not familiar with the W3C Web Services Architecture >> document, could you share your thoughts as to what would go in a >> potential "Stakehohlder's Perspectives" section for the SOA-RM? >> >> Thomas >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Francis McCabe" >> <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com> >> To: "Thomas Erl" <terl@serviceorientation.org> >> Cc: <soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org> >> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 9:11 AM >> Subject: Re: [soa-rm] SOA-RM Outline and Glossary >> >> >>> +1 >>> Frank >>> >>> On Apr 10, 2005, at 11:30 PM, Thomas Erl wrote: >>> >>>> During our last conference call Frank McCabe suggested that we >>>> consider >>>> using the W3C Web Services Architecture >>>> (http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-arch/) >>>> document's outline as the basis for our reference model outline. >>>> The parent >>>> level sections of this outline are as follows: >>>> >>>> 1 Introduction >>>> 2 Concepts and Relationships >>>> 3 Stakeholder's Perspectives >>>> 4 Conclusions >>>> >>>> The W3C supplements this document with a separate glossary. As per >>>> Ken's >>>> suggestion, we may want to consider adding a glossary as a fifth >>>> section or as an appendix. >>>> >>>> Thomas >>>> >>>> >> >> >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]