[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] RE: Definition of Reference Model (Was RE: [soa-rm] Definition of "Service Consumer")
We only become polarized if we let that happen. We have questions, many questions. I believe that some of those get answered as the questions form a pattern and we address the pattern. The discussion on security is an example. I (and others) are raising questions and past experience gives me a bent towards where I believe answers lie, but I most want to see how this whole puzzle fits together. I don't want to get off into navel-gazing but let's consider the questions and practice a little late-binding to the answers. Ken On Apr 12, 2005, at 7:20 PM, Duane Nickull wrote: > > > Chiusano Joseph wrote: > >> I get the strong sense that our TC is now polarized on this - and it >> is >> going to be very difficult to move forward in a coherent fashion until >> we get broad consensus on which approach we should take moving >> forward. > I disagree. I think that the touch point discussed today by Rebekah, > Anders and Matt identifies that the concept of a "security policy" > touches the RM. It is still very early on. I think very few are 100% > convinced either way. I would encourage all to keep an open mind at > this time. > > >> Thanks, >> Joe >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------ Ken Laskey MITRE Corporation, M/S H305 phone: 703-883-7934 7515 Colshire Drive fax: 703-883-1379 McLean VA 22102-7508
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]