Re: [soa-rm] core nature of a Service-Oriented Architecture [was:Security]

[Matthew MacKenzie <mattm@adobe.com>]

Its not 'private' if you cc the list, by the way.

If you look closely, you'll notice that the discussions have broken out 
from higher level vision statements.  Forest is in view.

Monica J. Martin wrote:

> Rex, privately, no one has really touched on what SOA is before they 
> start decomposing it. I see an approach of building from the ground 
> up. But, I've not had time to read all the treatises.  Someone else 
> mentioned this to me as well yesterday. Seems like 'can't see the 
> forest for the trees.' Thanks.
>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> It strikes me that the core nature of a Service-Oriented 
>>> Architecture  lies in a transactional model in which a Service 
>>> Provider or Service  Producer publishes a named set or container of 
>>> a service or services,  the description of which is searchable by a 
>>> Service Consumer according  to some set of features or criteria 
>>> which our RM provides.
>>>
>>> Even at a high level of abstraction, this will prove a test for us.
>>
>>
>
>