Re: [soa-rm] Types of Services (RE: [soa-rm]Definitionof"Service Consumer")

[Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com>]

McGregor.Wesley@tbs-sct.gc.ca wrote:

>Duane,
>
>II firmly believe that if we do not define service and SOA within the context of time (amongst a host of other domains as a set of constraints) the model will be too thin to be viable. For example, security is a domain that need not be concretely defined except as a set of constraints(s1, s2, s3...) where, say s1 is the authentication constraint,  that bound the system but allow for infinite derivations. We cannot ignore reality, but we can describe it abstractly and we must be able to show we have considered those things that keep dragging us into the concrete (nice pun here)
>  
>
Wes:

Please make a suggestion to the group.  How would you word an axiom to 
declare this?

Duane

-- 
***********
Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com
Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/
Adobe Enterprise Developer Resources  - http://www.adobe.com/enterprise/developer/main.html
***********