[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Sub Comittee and/or User guide
All: I have read through the last batch of email. There are a couple of things I would like to propose for comments. Please read this entire email before replying. 1. I will concede that many members of the public will likely have the same kinds of trouble interpreting a reference model vs. a reference architecture vs a specific architecture as seems to be pervasive on this list. If we have the problem in our context, it is likely to be present outside of this list. 2. We cannot redefine what a "reference model" is or what it includes. If we tried to change the industry definition of reference model to one that has concrete items in it or things that are not part of SOA (which is tricky since it is still undefined), it will not be a true reference model and hence not accepted by industry. 3. Service provider and service consumer are not part of a reference model. They are roles visible only in a runtime or infrastructure views of a specific architecture. To prove this point, please look once again at the OSI reference model. It is a communications stack RM yet does not contain notions of a message sender and message receiver. 4. We cannot mix abstract concepts and "things people can chew on" (implying concrete items) in our work. Such does run adverse to accepted architectural conventions. SOLUTION: One way forward is to probably create a sub committee to work on a reference architecture for SOA. A Reference Architecture could be developed in parallel to the reference model and is fair game to illustrate things like security, consumers, providers, agents etc. It is within our charter to do such. After reading through some older emails, I would assert that such a thing is probably essential along with some sort of white paper or user guide that explains the relationships between the RM, the RA and other architecture. Reference Model (is a guide for developing a) [ Reference Architecture || * Architecture ] There are several people on this list who also have stated specific needs for what they see in SOA. Perhaps this may be a good Sub Committee (SC) consideration also. Government Service Oriented Reference Architecture??? etc. I can already see there are many of you who could lead such an effort as a sub committee. Comments? Duane -- *********** Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/ Adobe Enterprise Developer Resources - http://www.adobe.com/enterprise/developer/main.html ***********
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]