[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Groups - Generic SOA-RM Boot Camp(SOAReferenceModel-Generic-rev1_05-03.ppt) uploaded
Martin: These are good points we need to understand. Can I ask for clarification on a few points. (1) What is your definition of "distributed"? This will probably be important to reach consensus on in our TC. I googled "define: distributed system" and found these definitions: http://www.google.com/search?q=define%3A+distributed+system&btnG=Google+Search Paraphrased: Distributed System: an aggregation of functionality from several computing entities to collaboratively run a computational task in a transparent and coherent way, so that they appear as a single, centralized system. Some of the definitions talked specifically about being distributed on a network (not good for RM). The physical separation aspect is not something I am clear about WRT being distributed. Can a chip hyperthread two processes and aggregate those at a higher level to appear as an opaque computational task? Perhaps distributed means logical separation? Not sure. (2) Even though we have not made a decision WRT BPM in the RM, do you think we could use a more abstract term for it such as "Management" or "Process Management"? This is primarily in recognition of the fact that not all SOA's are built for businesses. The concept can be added to our glossary and will need to be defined. I also used google to find some starter suggestions. I paraphrased several as: Process Management "..a multi-layered approach to the orchestration of lower activities, which produces a result for a given customer at a higher level." Would this work for folks? Comments? Duane Smith, Martin wrote: >Duane - - > >This a a good sort of thing to have available - - sort of a graphical FAQ. Thanks. > >Couple of substantive comments: >(1) I think many of us are scoping the work too narrowly: a "services RM" does not solve what I (at least) need, which is a "services-oriented distributed application" reference model. I had always assumed that when people said "SOA" they meant the latter. This draft seems to define the former. >(2) I don't think the RM should necessarily be limited to elements that are mandatory in all implementations. You suggest a formulation that avoids this for security (i.e, null security policy is a security policy); Rebecka used a similar device in observing that all mechanisms in a software environment can be defined as services and therefore we might not need to include any particular "SOA infrastructure" services separately in our RM. I would prefer to be explicit in getting a maximum set of elements on the table (BPM for example) and then coming back later to refactor or simplify the model. Otherwise we may end up with an elegantly simple but trivial product, meaning one that does not provide any useful guidance to architects. > >Martin > > >________________________________ > >From: dnickull@adobe.com [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com] >Sent: Fri 4/15/2005 4:29 PM >To: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: [soa-rm] Groups - Generic SOA-RM Boot Camp (SOAReferenceModel-Generic-rev1_05-03.ppt) uploaded > > > >This is a draft submission to help orient new members as they join. Please >review and comment on. Want to ensure that we are in basic agreement on >these items. > > -- Duane Nickull > >The document revision named Generic SOA-RM Boot Camp >(SOAReferenceModel-Generic-rev1_05-03.ppt) has been submitted by Duane >Nickull to the OASIS SOA Reference Model TC document repository. This >document is revision #1 of SOAReferenceModel-Generic-rev1_05-03.ppt. > >Document Description: >A draft presentation for orienting new members. > >View Document Details: >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm/document.php?document_id=12276 > >Download Document: >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm/download.php/12276/SOAReferenceModel-Generic-rev1_05-03.ppt > >Revision: >This document is revision #1 of SOAReferenceModel-Generic-rev1_05-03.ppt. >The document details page referenced above will show the complete revision >history. > > >PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email application >may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able to copy and paste >the entire link address into the address field of your web browser. > >-OASIS Open Administration > > > > -- *********** Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/ Adobe Enterprise Developer Resources - http://www.adobe.com/enterprise/developer/main.html ***********
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]