[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Architectural Scope of Reference Model
There is of course, in human affairs, the issue of intent. If you accidentally-on-purpose destroyed the only extant copy of a contract, then it would require adjudication which you might win! Frank On Apr 20, 2005, at 2:22 PM, Duane Nickull wrote: > Frank: > > Thank you for this analogy (ink over the representation). I think > this is a valuable analogy for understanding abstract elements and > their relationships to concrete implementations. > > Duane > > Francis McCabe wrote: > >> Think of human contracts: if you sign a contract, and then >> accidentally pour some ink over the paper that you signed; you still >> have a contract. All that the ink did was destroy the representation >> of the contract. >> >> This is what I meant earlier about UML -- it strongly encourages >> people to think in terms of specialization. But that is not the only >> relationship of interest. >> >> Frank > > > -- > *********** > Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - > http://www.adobe.com > Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/ > Adobe Enterprise Developer Resources - > http://www.adobe.com/enterprise/developer/main.html > *********** >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]