[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Comment: Section 2.1.1 Service Composition
See my message in the other thread (... Really An SOA). I chose the wrong thread to respond to, sorry. -Matt Duane Nickull wrote: > I would assert that regardless of whether they knew or talked to each > other previously, if a specific service does not meet the needs of a > specific consumer, and the consumer wishes to change that, they will > need to discuss it (and possibly re-engineer things) to meet their > needs if they desire. This does not assume any previous relationship. > > Can someone from the editing team please clarify if 2.1.1 is open for > comments? I thought we had agreed that it is not at present. > > Duane > > Chiusano Joseph wrote: > >> SECTION: 2.1.1 Service Composition >> >> LINE: 198 >> >> TEXT: "Accordingly, the service provider and consumer should discuss >> and re engineer the service." >> >> COMMENT: This text assumes that there is a relationship between the >> service provider and consumer in which they would undertake a >> discussion of the design of a service, and collaborate on its >> reengineering. This may sometimes be the case, but I would assert >> that most often it would not, as (a) the service consumer and >> provider may not even have any sort of relationship other than both >> being "reachable" from the WWW, and (b) even if so, the service >> consumer may not participate in any sort of discussion/reengineering >> unless perhaps the service was being created for the service consumer >> as part of a project. >> >> >> Kind Regards, >> Joseph Chiusano >> Booz Allen Hamilton >> Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com <http://www.boozallen.com/> >> > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]