RE: [soa-rm] When Is An SOA Really An SOA?

["Smith, Martin" <Martin.Smith@DHS.GOV>]

Duane - - Agree we agreed to defer "conformance" discussion, but I wanted to recall one alternative to "conformance" that came up is f2f discussion, namely "mapping" to the RM. 
 
For the App B "SOA examples" , I hope we can show mappings from the elements of each example SOA to elements of the RM.  Not necessarily 1-to-1; not certain if all elements of the example or elements of the RM have to have a mapping.  But I think that would help clarity of the relationship between RM and an instance SOA.
 
Martin
 

________________________________

From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com]
Sent: Thu 5/5/2005 2:18 PM
To: Chiusano Joseph
Cc: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] When Is An SOA Really An SOA?



Joseph:

No - the takeaway is that we agreed not to discuss conformance to the
SOA RM further until we are further along in defining the SOA RM
itself.  The discussion is likely dependent upon the work we are
currently doing.

Duane



Chiusano Joseph wrote:

> Thanks Duane. My takeaway from your responses below is that we cannot
> define what SOA is until we know what our reference model for SOA will
> look like.
> 
> Did I understand correctly?
> 
> Joe
> 
>
> Joseph Chiusano
>
> Booz Allen Hamilton
>
> Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com <http://www.boozallen.com/>
>