OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

soa-rm message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [soa-rm] Thoughts on document title



Duane - True, totally agree from the architectural RM perspective that
the RM should be implementer agnostic.  But in reality, we must keep in
mind that a SOA in a large company/enterprise is like apples and oranges
with the SOA on my home network in the context of the network and
systems 'architecture' that is necessary to support an SOA.  

I think, however, this distinction is covered in the glossary by
defining SOA as a 'software' architecture.  When you do that, you scope
down SOA in the context of a large enterprise significantly.

TM

-----Original Message-----
From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com] 
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 2:15 PM
To: Chiusano Joseph
Cc: Olson, Chandra S; soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Thoughts on document title

If it is in alignment with the definition in my email, then we have to
change the glossary.  SOA as a RM should probably not be specifically
tied to a certain class of implementors such as enterprises or only
large companies.

Duane

Chiusano Joseph wrote:

> Duane,
>  
> I can clarify: By saying "if we buy into the fact that SOA is a type 
> of Enterprise Architecture," I was referring to the definition of SOA 
> at the end of our current draft, which states that SOA is a type of 
> Enterprise Architecture.
>  
> FWIW, my definition of EA in line with what you present below. Hope 
> that helps.
> Joe
>  
>
> Joseph Chiusano
>
> Booz Allen Hamilton
>
> Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com 
> <https://webmail.bah.com/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.boozalle
> n.com/>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com]
> Sent: Fri 5/6/2005 1:01 PM
> To: Chiusano Joseph
> Cc: Olson, Chandra S; soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Thoughts on document title
>
> I am intrigued by the premise of enterprise architecture.  My 
> definition of EA is one of area of applicability, not any particular 
> style of architecture such as mainframe, client server, etc.  What is 
> your definition of EA?
>
> Duane
>
> Chiusano Joseph wrote:
>
> > 
> > By this I mean that, if we buy into the fact that SOA is a type of 
> > Enterprise Architecture,
>
>
> --
> ***********
> Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - 
> http://www.adobe.com Chair - OASIS Service Oriented Architecture 
> Reference Model Technical Committee - 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=soa-rm
> Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/ 
> Adobe Enterprise Developer Resources  - 
> http://www.adobe.com/enterprise/developer/main.html
> ***********
>

--
***********
Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com
Chair - OASIS Service Oriented Architecture Reference Model Technical
Committee -
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=soa-rm
Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/
Adobe Enterprise Developer Resources  -
http://www.adobe.com/enterprise/developer/main.html
***********



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]