[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [soa-rm] Thoughts on document title
Duane - True, totally agree from the architectural RM perspective that the RM should be implementer agnostic. But in reality, we must keep in mind that a SOA in a large company/enterprise is like apples and oranges with the SOA on my home network in the context of the network and systems 'architecture' that is necessary to support an SOA. I think, however, this distinction is covered in the glossary by defining SOA as a 'software' architecture. When you do that, you scope down SOA in the context of a large enterprise significantly. TM -----Original Message----- From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 2:15 PM To: Chiusano Joseph Cc: Olson, Chandra S; soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Thoughts on document title If it is in alignment with the definition in my email, then we have to change the glossary. SOA as a RM should probably not be specifically tied to a certain class of implementors such as enterprises or only large companies. Duane Chiusano Joseph wrote: > Duane, > > I can clarify: By saying "if we buy into the fact that SOA is a type > of Enterprise Architecture," I was referring to the definition of SOA > at the end of our current draft, which states that SOA is a type of > Enterprise Architecture. > > FWIW, my definition of EA in line with what you present below. Hope > that helps. > Joe > > > Joseph Chiusano > > Booz Allen Hamilton > > Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com > <https://webmail.bah.com/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.boozalle > n.com/> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com] > Sent: Fri 5/6/2005 1:01 PM > To: Chiusano Joseph > Cc: Olson, Chandra S; soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Thoughts on document title > > I am intrigued by the premise of enterprise architecture. My > definition of EA is one of area of applicability, not any particular > style of architecture such as mainframe, client server, etc. What is > your definition of EA? > > Duane > > Chiusano Joseph wrote: > > > > > By this I mean that, if we buy into the fact that SOA is a type of > > Enterprise Architecture, > > > -- > *********** > Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - > http://www.adobe.com Chair - OASIS Service Oriented Architecture > Reference Model Technical Committee - > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=soa-rm > Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/ > Adobe Enterprise Developer Resources - > http://www.adobe.com/enterprise/developer/main.html > *********** > -- *********** Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com Chair - OASIS Service Oriented Architecture Reference Model Technical Committee - http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=soa-rm Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/ Adobe Enterprise Developer Resources - http://www.adobe.com/enterprise/developer/main.html ***********
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]