[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Thoughts on document title
Yes - what I did not want to end up with is some axiom that says "SOA is only SOA if you have these [yet undefined] things AND you are an enterprise". I suggest that the glossary editor remove the reference to EA in the glossary. Is that Peter Brown? Duane tmathews@lmi.org wrote: >Duane - True, totally agree from the architectural RM perspective that >the RM should be implementer agnostic. But in reality, we must keep in >mind that a SOA in a large company/enterprise is like apples and oranges >with the SOA on my home network in the context of the network and >systems 'architecture' that is necessary to support an SOA. > >I think, however, this distinction is covered in the glossary by >defining SOA as a 'software' architecture. When you do that, you scope >down SOA in the context of a large enterprise significantly. > >TM > >-----Original Message----- >From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com] >Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 2:15 PM >To: Chiusano Joseph >Cc: Olson, Chandra S; soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Thoughts on document title > >If it is in alignment with the definition in my email, then we have to >change the glossary. SOA as a RM should probably not be specifically >tied to a certain class of implementors such as enterprises or only >large companies. > >Duane > >Chiusano Joseph wrote: > > > >>Duane, >> >>I can clarify: By saying "if we buy into the fact that SOA is a type >>of Enterprise Architecture," I was referring to the definition of SOA >>at the end of our current draft, which states that SOA is a type of >>Enterprise Architecture. >> >>FWIW, my definition of EA in line with what you present below. Hope >>that helps. >>Joe >> >> >>Joseph Chiusano >> >>Booz Allen Hamilton >> >>Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com >><https://webmail.bah.com/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.boozalle >>n.com/> >> >> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>-- >>From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com] >>Sent: Fri 5/6/2005 1:01 PM >>To: Chiusano Joseph >>Cc: Olson, Chandra S; soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org >>Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Thoughts on document title >> >>I am intrigued by the premise of enterprise architecture. My >>definition of EA is one of area of applicability, not any particular >>style of architecture such as mainframe, client server, etc. What is >>your definition of EA? >> >>Duane >> >>Chiusano Joseph wrote: >> >> >> >>>By this I mean that, if we buy into the fact that SOA is a type of >>>Enterprise Architecture, >>> >>> >>-- >>*********** >>Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - >>http://www.adobe.com Chair - OASIS Service Oriented Architecture >>Reference Model Technical Committee - >>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=soa-rm >>Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/ >>Adobe Enterprise Developer Resources - >>http://www.adobe.com/enterprise/developer/main.html >>*********** >> >> >> > >-- >*********** >Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com >Chair - OASIS Service Oriented Architecture Reference Model Technical >Committee - >http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=soa-rm >Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/ >Adobe Enterprise Developer Resources - >http://www.adobe.com/enterprise/developer/main.html >*********** > > > -- *********** Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com Chair - OASIS Service Oriented Architecture Reference Model Technical Committee - http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=soa-rm Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/ Adobe Enterprise Developer Resources - http://www.adobe.com/enterprise/developer/main.html ***********
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]