soa-rm message

Subject: RE: [soa-rm] Thoughts on document title

From: "Peter F Brown" <peter@justbrown.net>
To: "'John Harby'" <jharby@gmail.com>,<soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 12:54:23 +0200

+1

The other can imply, linguistically, that other RMs are possible...

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: John Harby [mailto:jharby@gmail.com] 
Sent: 06 May 2005 17:25
To: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: mattm@adobe.com
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Thoughts on document title

I like Service Oriented Architecture Reference Model

On 5/6/05, Matthew MacKenzie <mattm@adobe.com> wrote:
> Which is better?
> 
> Reference Model for Service Oriented Architecture Service Oriented 
> Architecture Reference Model
> 
> -Matt
>

References:
- Re: [soa-rm] Thoughts on document title
  - From: John Harby <jharby@gmail.com>