RE: [soa-rm] Loose Coupling

[Hamid Ben Malek <HMalek@us.fujitsu.com>]

+1

 

People like Anne, are one of the reasons why everybody is so confused about the essence of SOA.

 

---

From: Matthew MacKenzie [mailto:mattm@adobe.com]
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 4:11 AM
To: Don Flinn
Cc: Chiusano Joseph; soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Loose Coupling

 

We better close up shop then, eh?

 

I just want to point out that narrow definitions like Anne makes below are precisely the reason we commissioned this TC.  We need to take the higher ground on our definition, even if our day to day work screams in agreement with people like Anne.  My goal is for our RM to define the paradigm of service orientation so that SOA is not written off as the fad of 2004-2006.

 

-matt

 

On 20-May-05, at 1:47 AM, Don Flinn wrote:

 

"At a minimum, [an SOA fabric] needs to have Web services management and

Web services registry functionality built into it," she [Anne Thomas Manes] said.