[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] [issue:structure] draft 07, sect 2, line 201, Figure 2-1
But in that sense everything is a constraint. Frank does view the world that way (see his reply to my comment). Now if I may be pedantic - making everything a constraint is similar to saying that the words in a dictionary definition are a constraint because they constrain the way a word is used. While that may be ture, nobody thinks of a dictionary definition that way, so I am dubious about us looking at our definition of a service description that way. Michael At 06:26 PM 5/20/2005, Duane Nickull wrote: >My view on this is that the data model is a constraint of the information >flowing in and out of a service. It may be realized as a schema >referenced from a WSDL in WS architecture. >These things constraint the way a service is used. > >Duane > >Michael Stiefel wrote: > >>How is the data model a constraint? >> >>If everything is constraint, what is being constrained? >> >>Michael >> >>At 05:56 PM 5/20/2005, Francis McCabe wrote: >> >>>I would prefer to see >>>1. policy, contract linked together -- reflecting the contract=agreed >>>policy idea. >>>2. data model is one of the constraint types, like policy and contract >>>3. we should also mention process model if we are going to call out >>>the data model. >>> >>>Being a total pedantic, policy, agreement, process model, data model >>>together characterize the semantics; however, the metadata/service >>>description is a projection of that semantics (there may be several >>>service descriptions for one service). >>> >>>Frank >>> >>> >>>On May 20, 2005, at 2:44 PM, Duane Nickull wrote: >>> >>>>Michael: >>>> >>>>Thanks - I tried it horizontally and for some weird reason, it >>>>seems to resonate better. >>>> >>>>If we can get Frank's sign off and no one else has any opposition, >>>>maybe we can use this one? >>>> >>>>One other thought - should Data Model be larger? In the book >>>>Documenting Software Architectures, I seem to recall some >>>>conversation about size mattering (yeah yeah). Accordingly, I >>>>enlarged the data model to give it more presence. How does this >>>>look? See attached Core RM6.png >>>> >>>>Duane >>>> >>>>Michael Stiefel wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Would going from right to left or left to right remove any >>>>>associations of top and bottom as more natural or more fundamental? >>>>> >>>>>Have you ever looked at a globe with the Southern Hemisphere at >>>>>the top? To most of us that live in the Northern Hemisphere it >>>>>looks wrong, but of course, from the point of view of outer space >>>>>either pole of the globe could be on top. >>>>> >>>>>I like the fact that semantics will be explained on the side. >>>>> >>>>>Michael >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>At 02:37 PM 5/20/2005, Duane Nickull wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Here is a rendering based on Greg's diagram that accounts for all >>>>>>the comments below. >>>>>> >>>>>>- I placed Metadata as a bracket inside the "service description" >>>>>>box. >>>>>>- Semantics will have to be explained using text accompanying >>>>>>this diagram to state that they are omnipresent. >>>>>>- turned the stack upside down so service is at the bottom. To >>>>>>me, it seemed more intuitive that the thing that is core is at >>>>>>the bottom and the other items are built out (up??) from it. >>>>>>Comments? >>>>>>- used the UML dependency arrow as the convention between service >>>>>>and service description to denote that a SD should not exist >>>>>>without a service. >>>>>>- redrew the line between metadata and policy / contract to >>>>>>connect with the outer container of "constraints" >>>>>>- removed the words "enables discoverability" from the association. >>>>>> >>>>>>If we use this, we should probably build an appendix containing >>>>>>clear and concise rules about how to interpret this mind map >>>>>>since it borrows association conventions from UML and mixes them >>>>>>together with other conventions. >>>>>> >>>>>>Comments? >>>>>> >>>>>>Duane >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>><CoreRM6.png> >>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]