[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] [issue:structure] draft 07, sect 2, line 201, Figure 2-1
No, a processing model applies to each process independently. Frank On May 20, 2005, at 3:44 PM, Michael Stiefel wrote: > I agree that a processing model is important. > > Nonetheless, how does a processing model fit into a single service. > Does not a processing model imply more than one service? > > At one point people were distinguishing a POA from a SOA. > > Michael > > At 06:18 PM 5/20/2005, Francis McCabe wrote: > >> Duane: >> 1. Process model as in WSDL/BPEL/CDL etc. The order of actions >> against a service is at least as important as the data exchanged. >> 2. Yes, contracts are dependent on policies >> Frank >> P.S. Good work. However painful it may seem, the process is proving >> lightning fast. Perhaps there is more agreement on SOAs than on Web >> Services:) >> >> On May 20, 2005, at 3:05 PM, Duane Nickull wrote: >> >> >>> Frank: >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Francis McCabe wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> I would prefer to see >>>> 1. policy, contract linked together -- reflecting the >>>> contract=agreed policy idea. >>>> >>> >>> DN - would it be fair to state that a contract is dependent upon a >>> policy? I think this is in alignment with the thinking from the >>> F2F. >>> >>> >>> >>>> 2. data model is one of the constraint types, like policy and >>>> contract. >>>> >>> >>> DN - that makes sense. >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> 3. we should also mention process model if we are going to call >>>> out the data model. >>>> >>> >>> DN - pertaining to the process of the service, not multiple >>> services I presume? For example - the way WSDL can describe the >>> I/ O charateristics of a specific service?? >>> >>> I may whip up CoreRM7.png shortly. >>> >>> Duane >>> >> >> > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]